Knowledge

Allen v Flood

Source đź“ť

237:
wrongful act for which he is responsible at law. And answering the argument that the rule did not apply where the service had not commenced, although there was an existing contract, the learned judge says: “I think that the relation of master and servant subsists sufficiently for the purpose of such an action during the time for which there is in existence a binding contract of hiring and service between the parties.” Erle J. states the general principle thus: “He who maliciously procures a damage to another by violation of his right ought to be made to indemnify, and that whether he procures an actionable wrong or a breach of contract.” An employer may discharge a workman (with whom he has no contract), or may refuse to employ one from the most mistaken, capricious, malicious, or morally reprehensible motives that can be conceived, but the workman has no right of action against him. It seems to me strange to say that the principal who does the act is under no liability, but the accessory who has advised him to do so without any otherwise wrongful act is under liability.
1590: 1604: 206:
perfect right to fire off a gun, when all that was meant, apparently, was that a man has a freedom or liberty to fire off a gun, so long as he does not violate or infringe any one's rights in doing so, which is a very different thing from a right, the violation or disturbance of which can be remedied or prevented by legal process.
236:
shews that in their opinion at any rate it was vital to the plaintiffs' case that there was a subsisting contract of service. Crompton J. says that a person who maliciously interrupts the relation subsisting between master and servant during the time stipulated as the period of service commits a
146:
A trade union official told an employer his members would not work alongside the claimants. The employer was pressured to get rid of the claimants. For the loss of work, the claimants sued the trade union official. An important fact is that all the workers in the case were only hired day by day.
205:
In my subsequent remarks the word 'right' will, as far as possible, always be used in the above sense; and it is the more necessary to insist on this as during the argument at your Lordship's bar it was frequently used in a much wider and more indefinite sense. Thus it was said that a man has a
183:
The House of Lords held by a majority (Lord Watson, Lord Herschell, Lord Macnaghten, Lord Shand, Lord Davey, and Lord James) that even though there was a malicious motive, this could not render the conduct unlawful, because the effect actually complained of (not rehiring) was in itself entirely
230:, that to maliciously induce one to break a contract of exclusive personal service with an employer to the injury of that employer is actionable. But a perusal of the judgments delivered by the learned judges in 379: 167:
presided over the trial where the jury found that the plaintiffs had suffered damage to the extent of ÂŁ20 each, and assessed the damage accordingly.
226: 1664: 1571: 83: 997: 555: 454: 393: 1111: 980: 1566: 913: 814: 1644: 1073: 707: 1649: 426: 1659: 1233: 712: 67: 175:
Lord Esher MR, Lopes LJ and Rigby LJ held that the action was maintainable against the district delegate.
1228: 1203: 702: 1654: 1286: 1081: 1063: 103: 1415: 1456: 1243: 732: 717: 385: 293: 98:. Also invited to give opinions were Hawkins J, Mathew J, Cave J, North J, Wills J, Grantham J, 1511: 1496: 95: 1615: 1208: 886: 697: 288: 1336: 682: 164: 8: 1491: 631: 548: 1306: 965: 819: 804: 782: 526: 506: 459: 449: 378:
Douglas, Simon; McFarlane, Ben (28 November 2013). Penner, James; Smith, Henry (eds.).
148: 1291: 1213: 1051: 794: 789: 742: 667: 661: 501: 419: 389: 1296: 1263: 762: 626: 621: 586: 262: 201:
3. Rights of property; or, in other words, rights relating to mind, body and estate
131: 63: 1545: 1518: 1506: 1486: 1420: 1398: 1378: 1373: 1353: 1218: 1198: 1193: 1096: 1056: 767: 692: 616: 601: 521: 79: 1622: 1430: 1348: 937: 903: 854: 839: 611: 516: 496: 486: 75: 71: 1638: 1476: 1435: 1321: 1301: 1273: 1223: 1188: 1162: 1157: 1150: 1101: 1041: 881: 871: 829: 752: 747: 677: 636: 560: 257: 232: 220: 135: 116: 99: 1608: 1358: 1326: 1281: 1019: 1014: 985: 898: 876: 844: 777: 757: 651: 591: 581: 533: 491: 469: 412: 310: 218:
I accept for the present purpose without comment the doctrine laid down in
1530: 1471: 1461: 1258: 1253: 1091: 992: 908: 867: 834: 799: 722: 646: 596: 511: 276: 267: 1594: 1523: 1403: 1341: 1086: 1007: 1002: 960: 942: 930: 891: 737: 727: 687: 672: 656: 606: 543: 538: 305: 211: 187:
As one of those invited to give an opinion, Cave J said the following.
91: 87: 1501: 1466: 1408: 1383: 1248: 1145: 1133: 1118: 1106: 1034: 952: 925: 809: 1589: 1550: 1535: 1238: 1123: 920: 464: 1440: 1388: 1368: 1316: 1128: 1046: 862: 824: 772: 1540: 1393: 1138: 1029: 1024: 970: 641: 252:
has come under criticism in some quarters. In another leading
1481: 1425: 1331: 1172: 975: 474: 241:
Lord Halsbury LC, Lord Ashbourne and Lord Morris dissented.
1363: 1311: 1167: 565: 481: 253: 151:
because the contracts began afresh with a new day's work..
147:
Therefore, the trade union official had never threatened a
435: 274:
was approved by the House of Lords in the recent case of
191:
The personal rights with which we are most familiar are:
404: 286:also held that the earlier economic tort case of 1636: 377: 420: 427: 413: 138:on intentionally inflicted economic loss. 381:Philosophical Foundations of Property Law 1572:History of the American legal profession 198:2. Rights of bodily safety and freedom; 1637: 296:case, and not an economic torts case. 408: 1665:United Kingdom trade union case law 13: 170: 14: 1676: 556:Restitution and unjust enrichment 178: 1603: 1602: 1588: 1567:History of the legal profession 270:expressed disapproval. However 244: 371: 362: 349: 340: 331: 322: 1: 256:case in the context of union 159: 7: 299: 154: 10: 1681: 1234:International legal theory 713:International slavery laws 708:International human rights 703:International criminal law 355:see also, Patrick Devlin, 210:Giving the last judgment, 130:AC 1 is a leading case in 1582: 1559: 1449: 1287:Administration of justice 1272: 1181: 1072: 951: 853: 574: 442: 115: 110: 62: 57: 49: 44: 36: 28: 23: 1064:Basic structure doctrine 914:Natural and legal rights 795:Public international law 316: 195:1. Rights of reputation; 141: 1244:Principle of typicality 718:International trade law 434: 386:Oxford University Press 346:AC 1129, 1 All ER 367 239: 208: 96:Lord James of Hereford 1645:English tort case law 1239:Principle of legality 998:Delegated legislation 698:Intellectual property 357:Samples of Law-Making 289:Keeble v Hickeringill 216: 189: 1650:House of Lords cases 1457:Barristers' chambers 1399:Legal representation 1337:Justice of the peace 683:Financial regulation 214:said the following. 1660:1898 in British law 1492:Election commission 1204:Expressive function 733:Landlord–tenant law 632:Consumer protection 1450:Legal institutions 1317:Lawsuit/Litigation 1307:Dispute resolution 1112:Catholic canon law 820:State of emergency 783:Will and testament 507:Law of obligations 460:Constitutional law 450:Administrative law 149:breach of contract 1632: 1631: 1292:Constitutionalism 1214:Law and economics 1052:Act of parliament 790:Product liability 743:Legal archaeology 668:Environmental law 662:Entertainment law 502:International law 368:1 AC 1, UKHL 21. 123: 122: 1672: 1655:1898 in case law 1607: 1606: 1605: 1593: 1592: 1416:Question of fact 1297:Criminal justice 627:Construction law 622:Conflict of laws 587:Agricultural law 429: 422: 415: 406: 405: 400: 399: 375: 369: 366: 360: 353: 347: 344: 338: 335: 329: 326: 263:Rookes v Barnard 132:English tort law 64:Lord Halsbury LC 21: 20: 1680: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1628: 1601: 1587: 1578: 1555: 1546:Political party 1519:Legal education 1507:Law enforcement 1487:Court of equity 1445: 1421:Question of law 1374:Practice of law 1354:Judicial review 1268: 1219:Legal formalism 1199:Comparative law 1194:Contract theory 1177: 1097:Legal pluralism 1068: 1057:Act of Congress 981:Executive order 947: 849: 768:Nationality law 693:Immigration law 617:Competition law 570: 438: 433: 403: 396: 388:. p. 230. 376: 372: 367: 363: 354: 350: 345: 341: 336: 332: 327: 323: 319: 302: 247: 181: 173: 171:Court of Appeal 162: 157: 144: 80:Lord Macnaghten 17: 12: 11: 5: 1678: 1668: 1667: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1647: 1630: 1629: 1627: 1626: 1619: 1612: 1598: 1595:Law portal 1583: 1580: 1579: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1563: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1554: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1504: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1484: 1479: 1474: 1469: 1464: 1459: 1453: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1444: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1431:Trial advocacy 1428: 1423: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1339: 1329: 1324: 1319: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1299: 1294: 1289: 1284: 1278: 1276: 1270: 1269: 1267: 1266: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1191: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1176: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 1078: 1076: 1070: 1069: 1067: 1066: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1000: 990: 989: 988: 983: 978: 968: 963: 961:Ballot measure 957: 955: 949: 948: 946: 945: 940: 938:Legal treatise 935: 934: 933: 928: 918: 917: 916: 906: 904:Letters patent 901: 896: 895: 894: 884: 879: 874: 865: 859: 857: 855:Sources of law 851: 850: 848: 847: 842: 840:Unenforced law 837: 832: 827: 822: 817: 812: 807: 802: 797: 792: 787: 786: 785: 780: 770: 765: 760: 755: 750: 745: 740: 735: 730: 725: 720: 715: 710: 705: 700: 695: 690: 685: 680: 675: 670: 665: 659: 654: 649: 644: 639: 634: 629: 624: 619: 614: 612:Commercial law 609: 604: 599: 594: 589: 584: 578: 576: 572: 571: 569: 568: 563: 558: 553: 552: 551: 541: 536: 531: 530: 529: 524: 514: 509: 504: 499: 494: 489: 484: 479: 478: 477: 467: 462: 457: 452: 446: 444: 440: 439: 432: 431: 424: 417: 409: 402: 401: 394: 370: 361: 348: 339: 330: 320: 318: 315: 314: 313: 308: 301: 298: 272:Allen v. Flood 246: 243: 203: 202: 199: 196: 180: 179:House of Lords 177: 172: 169: 161: 158: 156: 153: 143: 140: 121: 120: 113: 112: 108: 107: 76:Lord Herschell 72:Lord Ashbourne 60: 59: 55: 54: 51: 47: 46: 42: 41: 38: 34: 33: 32:House of Lords 30: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1677: 1666: 1663: 1661: 1658: 1656: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1640: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1611: 1610: 1599: 1597: 1596: 1591: 1585: 1584: 1581: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1562: 1558: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1500: 1498: 1495: 1493: 1490: 1488: 1485: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1477:Civil society 1475: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1465: 1463: 1460: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1452: 1448: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1436:Trier of fact 1434: 1432: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1419: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1340: 1338: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1322:Legal opinion 1320: 1318: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1302:Court-martial 1300: 1298: 1295: 1293: 1290: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1277: 1275: 1274:Jurisprudence 1271: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1184: 1180: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1163:Statutory law 1161: 1159: 1158:Socialist law 1156: 1152: 1151:Byzantine law 1149: 1148: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102:Religious law 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1077: 1075: 1074:Legal systems 1071: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042:Statutory law 1040: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 996: 995: 994: 991: 987: 984: 982: 979: 977: 974: 973: 972: 969: 967: 964: 962: 959: 958: 956: 954: 950: 944: 941: 939: 936: 932: 929: 927: 924: 923: 922: 919: 915: 912: 911: 910: 907: 905: 902: 900: 897: 893: 890: 889: 888: 885: 883: 880: 878: 875: 873: 872:Statutory law 869: 866: 864: 861: 860: 858: 856: 852: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 830:Transport law 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 811: 808: 806: 803: 801: 798: 796: 793: 791: 788: 784: 781: 779: 776: 775: 774: 771: 769: 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 748:Legal fiction 746: 744: 741: 739: 736: 734: 731: 729: 726: 724: 721: 719: 716: 714: 711: 709: 706: 704: 701: 699: 696: 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 678:Financial law 676: 674: 671: 669: 666: 663: 660: 658: 655: 653: 650: 648: 645: 643: 640: 638: 637:Corporate law 635: 633: 630: 628: 625: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 579: 577: 573: 567: 564: 562: 561:Statutory law 559: 557: 554: 550: 547: 546: 545: 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 528: 525: 523: 520: 519: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 476: 473: 472: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 447: 445: 443:Core subjects 441: 437: 430: 425: 423: 418: 416: 411: 410: 407: 397: 395:9780191654527 391: 387: 383: 382: 374: 365: 359:(1962) 10-13. 358: 352: 343: 337:1 AC 1, 171-2 334: 325: 321: 312: 309: 307: 304: 303: 297: 295: 291: 290: 285: 284:Allen v Flood 281: 280: 278: 273: 269: 265: 264: 259: 258:strike action 255: 251: 250:Allen v Flood 242: 238: 235: 234: 233:Lumley v. Gye 229: 228: 227:Bowen v. Hall 223: 222: 221:Lumley v. Gye 215: 213: 207: 200: 197: 194: 193: 192: 188: 185: 176: 168: 166: 152: 150: 139: 137: 136:UK labour law 133: 129: 128: 127:Allen v Flood 118: 117:Economic tort 114: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 58:Case opinions 56: 52: 48: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 24:Allen v Flood 22: 19: 16:UK legal case 1621: 1614: 1600: 1586: 1359:Jurisdiction 1327:Legal remedy 1282:Adjudication 1182:Legal theory 1020:Ratification 1015:Promulgation 986:Proclamation 966:Codification 899:Human rights 887:Divine right 877:Constitution 845:Women in law 763:Military law 758:Marriage law 753:Maritime law 652:Election law 592:Aviation law 582:Abortion law 534:Property law 470:Criminal law 380: 373: 364: 356: 351: 342: 333: 324: 311:Contract law 287: 283: 282: 275: 271: 261: 249: 248: 245:Significance 240: 231: 225: 219: 217: 209: 204: 190: 186: 182: 174: 163: 145: 126: 125: 124: 50:Prior action 45:Case history 18: 1531:Legislature 1462:Bureaucracy 1259:Rule of man 1254:Rule of law 1229:Libertarian 1092:Chinese law 993:Legislation 943:Regulations 931:Law reports 909:Natural law 805:Reparations 800:Refugee law 723:Jurimetrics 664:(Media law) 602:Banking law 597:Amnesty law 575:Disciplines 512:Private law 292:was just a 277:OBG v Allan 268:Lord Devlin 84:Lord Morris 68:Lord Watson 1639:Categories 1524:Law school 1404:Prosecutor 1342:Magistrate 1129:Jewish law 1087:Common law 1008:Rulemaking 1003:Regulation 953:Law making 892:Divine law 868:Legal code 815:Sports law 738:Law of war 688:Health law 673:Family law 657:Energy law 607:Bankruptcy 544:Punishment 539:Public law 306:Labour law 212:Lord Davey 160:High Court 100:Lawrance J 92:Lord Davey 88:Lord Shand 1502:Judiciary 1497:Executive 1472:The bench 1409:Solicitor 1384:Barrister 1264:Sociology 1249:Pseudolaw 1189:Anarchist 1146:Roman law 1134:Parsi law 1119:Hindu law 1107:Canon law 1082:Civil law 1035:Concordat 926:Precedent 835:Trust law 810:Space law 647:Drugs law 517:Procedure 455:Civil law 165:Kennedy J 1609:Category 1551:Tribunal 1536:Military 1379:Attorney 1349:Judgment 1209:Feminist 1124:Jain law 921:Case law 642:Cyberlaw 549:Corporal 527:Criminal 497:Evidence 487:Doctrine 465:Contract 300:See also 294:nuisance 184:lawful. 155:Judgment 119:, strike 111:Keywords 104:Wright J 37:Citation 1623:Outline 1560:History 1467:The bar 1441:Verdict 1389:Counsel 1369:Justice 1224:History 1047:Statute 863:Charter 825:Tax law 773:Probate 328:2 QB 21 53:2 QB 21 1541:Police 1512:Agency 1394:Lawyer 1139:Sharia 1030:Treaty 1025:Repeal 971:Decree 882:Custom 778:Estate 728:Labour 492:Equity 392:  94:, and 1616:Index 1482:Court 1426:Trial 1332:Judge 1173:Yassa 976:Edict 522:Civil 475:Crime 317:Notes 142:Facts 29:Court 1364:Jury 1312:Fiqh 1168:Xeer 566:Tort 482:Deed 390:ISBN 254:tort 224:and 134:and 102:and 40:AC 1 436:Law 1641:: 870:/ 384:. 266:, 260:, 90:, 86:, 82:, 78:, 74:, 70:, 66:, 428:e 421:t 414:v 398:. 279:. 106:.

Index

Lord Halsbury LC
Lord Watson
Lord Ashbourne
Lord Herschell
Lord Macnaghten
Lord Morris
Lord Shand
Lord Davey
Lord James of Hereford
Lawrance J
Wright J
Economic tort
English tort law
UK labour law
breach of contract
Kennedy J
Lord Davey
Lumley v. Gye
Bowen v. Hall
Lumley v. Gye
tort
strike action
Rookes v Barnard
Lord Devlin
OBG v Allan
Keeble v Hickeringill
nuisance
Labour law
Contract law
Philosophical Foundations of Property Law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑