Knowledge

1Co+Co1

Source 📝

17: 241: 202: 120: 162: 144:
for a 1Co+Co1 locomotive. However, the use of a bogie with an integral pony truck was not universally accepted by ALCO's engineering management. The result was that ALCO bid on only the Co+Co option and lost out to GE, who had bid on both options. In South Africa, this virtually opened the floodgates for GE, since more than half of the SAR's vast
143:
had a design on paper for a 1Co bogie which could be utilised by either ALCO or GE and which would enable the SAR's specification to be met for the heavier 1,800 horsepower (1,300 kilowatts) units. The SAR made it clear that, despite the two options afforded by the tender, its strong preference was
231:
locomotive on the 1Co bogies of the Class 32-000, which reduced its axle load from the 15,749 kilograms (15.5 long tons) of the Class 33-000 to 12,700 kilograms (12.5 long tons). Apart from the bogies, which necessitated a smaller fuel tank, its physical dimensions and exterior appearance were
35:
with an articulated inter-bogie connection, each with three axles powered by a separate traction motor per axle and with the fourth non-powered axle in an integral leading pony truck to reduce the axle load. The similar
138:
and had a strong preference for ALCO's Model 251 engine and GE's transmission systems. As a prior supplier of steam locomotives for the SAR, ALCO appeared to be virtually assured of receiving the order.
220:, where very light rail conditions necessitated lighter axle loadings which could not be achieved with conventional three-axle bogies under a heavy 96,520 kilograms (95 long tons) locomotive. 184:(NBL) between 1952 and 1953. The Class 4E was amongst the most powerful electric locomotives in the world at that time and at 157,488 kilograms (155 long tons), it was a heavy locomotive for 62: 279:
South African Railways Index and Diagrams Electric and Diesel Locomotives, 610mm and 1065mm Gauges, Ref LXD 14/1/100/20, 28 January 1975, as amended
381: 131: 324: 391: 108:(GE) in the locomotive building business. In 1957, the South African Railways (SAR) called for tenders with two options. 16: 181: 354: 198:. The reasons for the leading pony truck were both to improve stability at speed and to reduce the axle load. 386: 376: 101: 228: 224: 213: 205: 145: 97: 56: 20: 227:
GE type U20C1 diesel-electric locomotives entered service on the SAR. The Class 32-200 was actually a
85:. This was accomplished by the addition of a non-powered axle in an integral pony truck to the three 51: 77:
The 1Co+Co1 wheel arrangement for electric and diesel-electric locomotives was a development of the
177: 135: 93: 81:
wheel arrangement to enable a relatively heavy locomotive to work on light rail by reducing the
173: 165: 140: 123: 44:
classification is in the same axle configuration, but without the inter-bogie connection.
8: 350: 320: 217: 27:
Under the British and Imperial classification scheme of locomotive axle arrangements
112:
115 1,800 horsepower (1,300 kilowatts) locomotives with a 1Co+Co1 wheel arrangement.
105: 232:
identical to that of the Co+Co Class 33-000 and it used the same V12 prime mover.
240: 31:
is a classification code for a locomotive wheel arrangement of two eight-wheeled
115:
230 1,000 horsepower (750 kilowatts) locomotives with a Co+Co wheel arrangement.
253: 252:
A number of Japanese electrics from the 1930s, also on Cape gauge, such as the
245: 86: 370: 201: 119: 194: 148:
fleet which would be acquired between 1959 and 1981 were GE products.
82: 161: 39: 78: 349:(1st ed.). Cape Town: Struik. pp. 126–127, 138–139. 32: 100:
is credited with being a major factor in the demise of the
302:
The American Locomotive Company - A Centennial Remembrance
216:
GE type U18C1 diesel-electric locomotives in service in
275: 273: 271: 269: 212:
Between 1959 and 1961, the SAR placed 115 high-nosed
319:. Melbourne University Publishing Ltd. p. 212. 176:
electric locomotive was designed for the SAR by the
266: 368: 340: 338: 336: 344: 333: 130:The SAR was not very enthusiastic about the 347:Locomotives of the South African Railways 299: 239: 200: 160: 118: 15: 369: 295: 293: 291: 289: 287: 285: 132:General Motors Electro-Motive Division 47:Other equivalent classifications are: 345:Paxton, Leith; Bourne, David (1985). 308: 223:In June and July 1966, ten low-nosed 314: 282: 13: 317:The Railways of Victoria 1854-2004 14: 403: 182:North British Locomotive Company 156: 1: 259: 256:also used this arrangement. 7: 392:Commonwealth classification 180:(GEC) and was built by the 102:American Locomotive Company 72: 10: 408: 146:diesel-electric locomotive 98:South African Class 32-000 21:South African Class 32-000 382:(1′Co)+(Co1′) locomotives 235: 186:3 ft 6 in 178:General Electric Company 151: 94:United States of America 300:Steinbrenner, Richard. 104:(ALCO) and the rise of 249: 209: 169: 141:General Steel Castings 127: 124:General Steel Castings 24: 243: 204: 164: 122: 19: 315:Lee, Robert (2007). 387:1Co+Co1 locomotives 377:1-C+C-1 locomotives 250: 210: 170: 128: 89:Co powered bogie. 63:UIC classification 52:AAR classification 25: 326:978-0-522-85134-2 218:South West Africa 136:two-cycle engines 399: 361: 360: 342: 331: 330: 312: 306: 305: 297: 280: 277: 197: 191: 187: 106:General Electric 87:traction motored 42: 407: 406: 402: 401: 400: 398: 397: 396: 367: 366: 365: 364: 357: 343: 334: 327: 313: 309: 298: 283: 278: 267: 262: 238: 208:diesel-electric 193: 189: 185: 159: 154: 75: 38: 23:diesel-electric 12: 11: 5: 405: 395: 394: 389: 384: 379: 363: 362: 355: 332: 325: 307: 281: 264: 263: 261: 258: 237: 234: 158: 155: 153: 150: 117: 116: 113: 74: 71: 70: 69: 60: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 404: 393: 390: 388: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 374: 372: 358: 352: 348: 341: 339: 337: 328: 322: 318: 311: 303: 296: 294: 292: 290: 288: 286: 276: 274: 272: 270: 265: 257: 255: 247: 242: 233: 230: 226: 221: 219: 215: 207: 203: 199: 196: 190:1,067 mm 183: 179: 175: 167: 163: 149: 147: 142: 137: 133: 125: 121: 114: 111: 110: 109: 107: 103: 99: 95: 90: 88: 84: 80: 68: 67:(1′Co)+(Co1′) 64: 61: 59: 58: 53: 50: 49: 48: 45: 43: 41: 34: 30: 22: 18: 346: 316: 310: 301: 251: 229:Class 33-000 225:Class 32-200 222: 214:Class 32-000 211: 206:Class 32-200 172:The 3 kV DC 171: 157:South Africa 129: 91: 76: 66: 55: 46: 37: 28: 26: 371:Categories 356:0869772112 260:References 195:Cape gauge 244:Japanese 83:axle load 174:Class 4E 168:electric 166:Class 4E 73:Overview 248:in 1938 126:' bogie 92:In the 57:1-C+C-1 40:1Co-Co1 29:1Co+Co1 353:  323:  134:(EMD) 96:, the 33:bogies 236:Japan 152:Usage 79:Co+Co 351:ISBN 321:ISBN 254:EF10 246:EF10 373:: 335:^ 284:^ 268:^ 192:) 65:: 54:: 359:. 329:. 304:. 188:(

Index


South African Class 32-000
bogies
1Co-Co1
AAR classification
1-C+C-1
UIC classification
Co+Co
axle load
traction motored
United States of America
South African Class 32-000
American Locomotive Company
General Electric

General Steel Castings
General Motors Electro-Motive Division
two-cycle engines
General Steel Castings
diesel-electric locomotive

Class 4E
Class 4E
General Electric Company
North British Locomotive Company
Cape gauge

Class 32-200
Class 32-000
South West Africa

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.