110:. That's just my opinion. No one else is bound by it. But let's just say this – we've been trying it "your way" (i.e. the current policies and practices) for awhile, and look at where it's gotten us. Growth is beginning to stagnate. How about trying something different? Is it a possibility? Or is it too dangerous to risk? Well, OK. Have it your way, then.
88:
what made this community function. It's breaking down. Common argument in the discussion, "I don't see the point." Precisely. Whatever we don't understand, kill. Abandon hope, all ye who enter here. I see only one way to counter this creeping death: a communications structure that exposes all this, rapidly and efficiently.--
31:
I think it's a bit too far to argue that essays should be rated and have "featured essays." That might be a good idea in the future, but there's so much work that needs to be done, as it is, that we should just focus on categorizing them right now, into sub-categories, because they're a pain to dig
87:
was deleted, though there was clearly no consensus for that; the closing administrator didn't say why. I find the discussion disturbing in the light of other recent history I've been noticing. A loss of community. These quirky categories and essays and self-deprecating or ironic humor are part of
291:
106:, everybody! If it feels good, do it. If it harms the encyclopedia, and that harm outweighs the benefits of keeping it, delete it. But don't do this knee-jerk crap of just deleting stuff that doesn't fit your vision of what this project should be, and what
283:
263:
222:
344:
303:
294:, plus subcategories for quality assessment, hotlist for articles needing immediate attention, articles under peer review, &c. What further additions, if any in the short term?
273:
210:
197:
63:
205:
119:
97:
278:
290:
This would be a good start. I am uncertain how a category on humorous essays will fit here; but Talk pages for the Essays in all of the above
Categories would be in a common
268:
254:
73:
54:
Agreed. We will have plenty of time to do that "fun stuff" later. However, if someone feels like doing it now, more power to them; it just won't be me at that time.
178:
48:
260:
Concerning the classes of Essays listed at the Top of this Talk page as of 05:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC), I recommend creation of the following
Categories:
325:): {{Essaysort|category=no}} As of this post, the Class, Importance and Attention functions are activated; what other functions, if any, will be needed?
81:
321:
17:
213:
when the above types of essays are given
Categories. Do inform me which Categories are goes when the relevant discussion concludes.
309:
72:
Well, speaking of "fun stuff," somebody around here doesn't like it. Looking at the category mentioned on the project page,
233:
202:
This is a good start. I currently have an Essay in alpha, concerning problems encountered in assessing factual accuracy (
129:
In any case, does anyone have any suggestions for categorization schemes, or should we just make them up as we go along?
84:
155:
There are some grey areas, though, where it seems like some essays fall into more than one category.
340:
330:
299:
218:
193:
115:
59:
26:
315:
238:
About the essay categorization schemes? Let's focus discussion on it. How should it be done?
77:
8:
336:
326:
295:
214:
189:
111:
55:
250:
174:
44:
162:
is great to apply to essays, talkpages, and userspace, but NOT to the mainspace.
107:
93:
245:
185:
169:
159:
103:
39:
292:
Category:WikiProject Essay
Categorization and/or Classification articles
89:
206:
User:B.C.Schmerker/Essay:When the
Sources' Accuracy Is Disputed
188:
needs some refinement before it will make sense for mainspace.
32:
through and there appears to be a fair amount of duplicates.
240:
164:
34:
314:
I completed a prototype
Template for this Project from
322:User:B.C.Schmerker/Templates/WPEssay (alpha)
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Knowledge essays
284:Category:Essays on Knowledge in general
14:
264:Category:Essays on specific policies
23:
24:
356:
310:Proposal for Essay Talk Template
274:Category:Essays on controversies
211:Category:Essays on controversies
80:. And then, a link to this CfD:
184:Yes, I agree with you on that.
148:Essays on Knowledge, in general
85:Category:Wikipedian WikiDragons
304:05:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
132:It seemed to me that there's:
13:
1:
279:Category:Essays giving advice
102:Can't people just chill out?
269:Category:Essays on proposals
234:Essay categorization schemes
7:
333:) 08:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
136:Essays on specific policies
10:
361:
318:, for your consideration (
255:21:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
198:05:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
179:05:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
120:04:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
98:02:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
64:01:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
49:00:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
345:08:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
223:06:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
74:Category:Knowledge fauna
209:), probably to go into
142:Essays on controversies
316:Template:WPBannerMeta
145:Essays giving advice
78:Knowledge:WikiDragon
158:Also, I think that
139:Essays on proposals
76:, I saw the essay,
347:
352:
334:
248:
243:
172:
167:
42:
37:
360:
359:
355:
354:
353:
351:
350:
349:
337:B. C. Schmerker
327:B. C. Schmerker
312:
296:B. C. Schmerker
244:
239:
236:
215:B. C. Schmerker
168:
163:
151:Humorous essays
38:
33:
29:
27:Featured essays
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
358:
311:
308:
307:
306:
288:
287:
286:
281:
276:
271:
266:
235:
232:
230:
228:
227:
226:
225:
153:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
122:
67:
66:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
357:
348:
346:
342:
338:
335:Amendment by
332:
328:
324:
323:
317:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
267:
265:
262:
261:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
247:
242:
231:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
190:Obuibo Mbstpo
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
176:
171:
166:
161:
156:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
134:
133:
130:
121:
117:
113:
112:Obuibo Mbstpo
109:
105:
104:Laissez-faire
101:
100:
99:
95:
91:
86:
82:
79:
75:
71:
70:
69:
68:
65:
61:
57:
56:Obuibo Mbstpo
53:
52:
51:
50:
46:
41:
36:
19:
319:
313:
237:
229:
203:
157:
154:
131:
128:
30:
108:it is not
246:Zenwhat
170:Zenwhat
40:Zenwhat
186:WP:LF
160:WP:LF
16:<
341:talk
331:talk
320:see
300:talk
251:talk
219:talk
204:see
194:talk
175:talk
116:talk
94:talk
60:talk
45:talk
90:Abd
343:)
302:)
253:)
221:)
196:)
177:)
118:)
96:)
83:.
62:)
47:)
339:(
329:(
298:(
249:(
241:☯
217:(
192:(
173:(
165:☯
114:(
92:(
58:(
43:(
35:☯
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.