Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Creationism - Knowledge

Source 📝

2071:. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off). 1687:
documents, to specific vote results etc. Creationist (unreliable for scientific claims) sources were used to illustrate creationist reaction to the resolution, not to make some scientific point. Secondary sources were not only listed, but also used - mentioning in the main text, for example, the Russian Orthodox Church criticism and the 2009 conference in Germany. Some of them were really listed only - but that was made in response to User:Hrafn's call to show secondary-source coverage deemed necessary to create an article. We could retell the resolution using those news articles - but I doubt whether it's reasonable when we already have some quotes.
2271: 1767:: in those specific cases primary sources were the best (for example, newspapers and other secondary sources don't tend to give information of voting on amendments and on voting by delegates' surnames - in the best case they give the final text adopted and the number of votes cast in favour or against). Besides, it's not trivia, it's description of the history and political struggle on the content of the resolution. The fact that a report is sent back to the committee is not typical and also deserves mentioning. 203: 148: 130: 2219: 99: 1025:, and would very much appreciate the input of any interested editors. I am thinking that it might run over two months, the first of which would be to bring forward and discuss the current state of the content, and the second for perhaps some more focused discussion on what, if any, specific efforts might be taken in the near future. Any and all input is more than welcome. 2447:, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time. 1941:. Any input would be welcome. I personally believe at least one of the reasons why many articles in this field have been as contentious as they have been is because of lack of such guidelines, and would very much welcome any input from others to help come up with some generally acceptable solutions to some of these problems. 318: 2185:
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Knowledge struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for
2557:
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you?
1433:
is a young earth creationist, zoologist and paleobiologist. The page had been nominated for deletion but the closing admin announced that there was no consensus. He invited those concerned about the article to try again in a month or two. Any editors interested in helping develop the page, we could
1411:
has gotten to a sufficient level that I've decided that the best thing for me to do is to take a self-imposed (and thus purely voluntary) topic-ban on the article. I am therefore requesting that any Creationism regulars who have the time (and particularly any who have better grace under fire than I
1686:
I cannot call helpful your removal of content to be discussed (after you've recognized the sources justify a more detailed desciption in that article and suggested to me to put there the information). Primary sources were used where they are the best - for referring to full official texts of PACE
1506:
Okay. For the record, I did not follow you here. The Brand article is/should be part of this project's interest. Without checking the bottom of the page, I started a new section, posted it, found that there was already a section started by you. I put my message below yours. You have made it very
2234:
is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating
1079:
Given the tiny fraction of said relationship that is 'Creationism', I would personally say no. But probably it is more a case of nobody within the Wikiproject considering that article sufficiently relevant, and sufficiently in need of patrolling (it's already, independently, on my, and I would
1776: 1020:
Given the closely linked subjects of the various religion, mythology, and philosophy groups, it seems to me that we might benefit from having some sort of regular topical discussion forum to discuss the relevant content. I have put together the beginnings of an outline for such discussion at
622:
as vaguely-relevant, rationales #2 'Overlap' -- ID is explicitly a 'big tent' creationist movement, and has many YECs & OECs in its fold; #4 'Context' -- ID can best be described as one of the more recent evolutions of Creationism, not as a movement that sprang forth without any
2418:
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template
338:
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of November, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as
2386:, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Creationism, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at 1779:
with the very same sources yesterday - and there is not a single objection against its existence. I don't claim that the community of the Russian-language WP (which is, however, well-established and has created over 800 000 articles) is always right, but the fact is
776:, which has ID & YEC as task forces within the project. Most of the links from it are of course red-linked, until a post-expansion rename, but if anybody wants to check the syntax (and/or debate any underlying assumptions), I'd be happy for the input. 1748:
I dont' consider the persistent use of capital letters to be helpful, either...1. Most sources given already were not only listed, but also - but please, I'm still co-operative and I've added even more information, for example, on what Lengagne says in
1813:
I have recently removed the section detailing "Creationist arguments" from the article. I argued that there are other articles that discuss the controversy, and that this article should focus only on transitional fossils. I am working on expanding the
2094:
is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.
1130:? I didn't. Speaking for myself, I'm not in favour of a heavily subpage-based project page (it means more pages to keep track of on my watchlist). And it'd be nice if Arlen22 did us the courtesy of discussing a proposed major restructure here 321:. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at 2186:
the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please
2459:. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals. 1153:
Well then let's discuss it. If you don't like it, I don't have to. I could probably use my skills just as good to help maintain the current page. You're right, it is more pages to keep track of. Hey, whatever, it's up to you.
269: 536: 293: 2302: 1580: 770: 600: 2408:
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
1292:
You should first check to see if the link has simply been moved, If not, if it's just an External link, not a reference-in-an-article, you should simply delete it (if it is a reference, you should either try
504: 2682:
and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
1480:-- an AfD that DRS scuttled with his endless endlesssness. I value competence, clarity and conciseness -- concepts that appear to be entirely foreign to DRS -- which is perhaps why the guy acts like 840: 358: 629:
The fact that most ID articles are fairly stable, and in a number of cases becoming somewhat stale, due to lack of ongoing coverage -- resulting in their being merged into more general articles.
2265: 1194:
Well, the lime-green can be changed. As for KISS, sounds great. We can always tweak this to make it look better if need be. I agree that at this rate there isn't a whole lot of benefit anyway.
370:
WikiProject Young Earth Creationism is on the verge of going live, if you are interested in joining please follow the link above. We will be cooperating extensively with this WikiProject..--
648: 571: 395:) and created another part way through creating this purported 'Wikiproject'). It has therefore been userfied, per consultation with another experienced editor (Hans Adler) on its talkpage. 2400: 2022: 1650: 591: 2456: 962: 1896: 2324: 2550:! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the 446: 2343:
is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month,
1889: 1818:
and improving it so it eventually gets GA or FA status. Right now its going through copy-editing. After that will be peer review. See these recent discussions for more information:
485:
You are free to hold that opinion. Knowledge welcomes editors of all backgrounds. Feel free to consider joining this project once it gets going so we have a critical perspective..--
2308:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
1615:
The sources mentioned show wide attention both from different sides of the debate and from mainstream media and mainstream confessions to the resolution and reports preceding it.
2434: 2737: 585: 2086:
is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available
626:
The fact that the IDM movement generally doesn't even explicitly mention ID any more -- using code-phrases like 'strengths and weaknesses' and 'academic freedom' instead.
467:
I just took a look at their contributions and what I saw supported my initial hunch: there is a pattern of supporting pseudosciences of all stripes. For example, there's
2463: 2239:! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! 881:
hasn't been updated in three years. And to be honest, I don't really think keeping it up to date is worth the trouble -- that's what categories are for. I'm therefore
2098:
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the
1989: 39: 760: 653: 2011: 1971: 1355: 1113: 1093: 1619: 496: 468: 442: 303: 2571: 1847: 1984: 1568: 1550: 1516: 1501: 2518:. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like 1600: 1147: 1121: 518: 1623: 480: 2535: 2208: 1858: 1301: 1878: 1869:
It is a very important subject, and I wish to take it to GA/FA status in the future. Input from members of this wikiproject would be highly valued. --
462: 428: 408: 2541: 2450: 927: 2576: 2476: 2136: 1927: 1477: 1073: 224: 219: 2559: 1203: 1189: 1163: 2350: 2045: 1955: 1950: 1822: 1801: 1789: 1743: 1696: 1681: 364: 273: 257: 1168:
Given that this project is generally fairly quiet (most of the real excitement occurs on article talk, not here), I'm in favour of applying the
1938: 1827: 1443: 2148: 2125: 2180: 2175: 1781: 1768: 1688: 1642: 1634: 392: 1271: 1241: 868: 766:
As the proposed expansion seems likely to pass, I've taken the liberty of creating a proposed revised template to reflect this expansion at
2596: 1596: 1172:
as much as is possible. I went through and updated most of the project page at the start of the year when the scope was expanded. I'm also
989: 851: 2756: 2751: 2443: 1022: 272:
will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the
2498: 2260: 2198:(Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) 2554:
that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
2503: 1630: 1604: 1592: 988:
Hi there. I noticed that "Category:FA-Class Creationism articles" has 2 featured articles, but they don't show up on the WikiProject's
878: 747: 288: 74: 2034: 2761: 1995: 1883: 1730:
the sources to demonstrate that they have something of substance to say about the topic -- simply listing sources is not sufficient.
1537:
if you are doing so for the first time. It reduces your chances of putting your foot in it -- something we all do from time to time.
1055: 1010: 819: 2057: 715: 903:
I've found out that you can insert an automatic 'category tree' of articles into a page, so I've replaced the manual list with it.
728: 2090:(editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. 1425: 701: 1852: 1775:) 08:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)P.S. By the way, an illustrative experiment: I've created an article on the resolution in ru.wiki 1457:
incompetence -- so what do you do? You follow me to a Wikiproject you are not even a member of to intrude yourself further. Your
978: 829: 741: 685: 414: 388: 939: 916: 898: 2522:), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the 1763:- they were used only to confirm the fact that certain statements were made by their authors. 3. primary-sourced bureaucratic 381: 1127: 80: 807: 789: 671: 2733: 1385: 1380: 1334: 299: 2340: 2228:
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that
1832: 756:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2292: 1937:
There is now a proposed general Manual of Style for Religion and other articles relating to ethoses or belief systems at
1389: 1911: 2246: 864: 2464:
article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject
2062: 1932: 1372: 155: 135: 24: 2551: 1668:(rather than makes any use of) WP:SECONDARY coverage, it makes for a very poor argument for an independent article. 1591:
has without discussion turned that article on the PACE resolution with the respective title into a redirect page to
1015: 2482:
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the
2423: 2353:
with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Creationism.
2387: 1810:. Should I add this to the WIkiproject Creationism? I'm not sure. If so what level of importance would it have? 2729: 2130: 2099: 1999: 251: 2710: 2213: 2153: 20: 2314:
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
1394: 2694: 2188: 2139:. He is an American evangelist and creationist. If you have time please give your thoughts on the article. -- 2087: 391:-- it therefore has no legitimate existence. It has only a single member/creator (who 'retired' one account ( 69: 961:
disinterested in actually discussing the thing. This editor is the same one that I locked horns with on the
2515: 1902: 1564: 1512: 1439: 1004: 110: 2469:
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
2493: 2192:
and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my
2163: 2083: 1921: 1737: 1675: 1544: 1495: 1419: 1406: 1341: 1328: 1257: 1227: 1183: 1141: 1099: 1087: 1059: 972: 910: 892: 801: 783: 665: 642: 565: 456: 402: 60: 441:
Only after it was userfied. And I would note that you have failed to create a normal proposal (example:
1038: 983: 822:
regarding the watch image used. If changed, IMO the change should also be rolled out to the following:
348: 332: 323: 354:
If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. For the Knowledge 1.0 editorial team,
268:
will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's
2523: 2690: 2587:
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to
2582: 2311:
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
2245:
To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to
2068: 1965: 1957: 1361: 1311: 1049: 813: 558:
The result of this discussion was to expand the project to cover to the wider topic of creationism
476: 1815: 1223:
Advocacy of Intelligent Design is indistinguishable from parody of advocacy of Intelligent Design
310:(revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the 163:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2236: 2230: 2218: 2016: 1560: 1508: 1435: 944: 711: 992:. I have no idea why that is, but I thought I'd let you guys know just in case it's a problem. — 335:. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Sunday, November 14th. 2457:
RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace
2039: 1402: 724: 1321:
I've removed the first link & updated the second to a similar page that does still exist.
387:
This purported 'Wikiproject' has not been proposed (let alone accepted) via the proper forum,
2651: 2483: 2082:. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The 1946: 1376: 1030: 873: 697: 514: 492: 424: 377: 240: 116: 582:
This idea has been raised twice in the past, with no dissent, but with very little comment:
2671: 2510: 2171: 2144: 2030: 1874: 1843: 1453:
do you? I self-topic-banned myself in large part to avoid further losing my temper at your
1398: 860: 737: 681: 340: 2290:
message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the
8: 2679: 2370:
The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
2053: 2044:
I have proposed to merge this wikiproject and 12 others to a new wikiproject. Please see
1980: 1863: 1807: 1760: 1751: 1716: 1465: 954: 921: 472: 50: 1434:
use your help. Thanks. (Hrafn provided much needed editor judgment. He will be missed.)
2706: 2567: 2270: 2115: 2107: 2079: 935: 707: 331:
and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at
65: 2394: 2336: 2641: 2592: 2318: 1661: 1213: 1199: 1159: 885:
tagging it as 'historical' & removing tasks related to it from the project page.
720: 608: 607:
I am therefore raising it a third time, so "speak now or forever hold your peace" --
355: 46: 1975:. any input on how to improve the article would be very much appreciated. Thanks! -- 794:
I've implemented the expansion. If anybody notices any cockups, please let me know.
632:
The fact that many editors active on ID are already active on Creationism generally.
2718: 2402: 2235:
easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested,
1942: 1785: 1772: 1692: 1646: 1638: 1599:. According to Hrafn's suggestion, I've currently incorporated the information in ( 1430: 1368: 1042: 1026: 999: 692: 509: 487: 419: 372: 2330: 1476:
by me. Any regulars on here who wish to understand my anger should take a look at
328: 2675: 2547: 2256: 2204: 2193: 2167: 2159: 2140: 2026: 2002:
don't say one way or another if the subject is Old Earth or New Earth, though. --
1870: 1839: 1660:
Given that Fuseau's attempted addition to that article (i) relies in the main on
1507:
clear that you need a break. I respect that. I have no wish to upset you. Sorry.
733: 677: 619: 265: 2714: 2049: 1976: 1756: 1169: 1080:
suspect numerous other Wikiproject members', watchlists) to warrant inclusion.
882: 601:
WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/WikiProject Young Earth Creationism#Discussion
363: 2091: 2023:
Talk:Creation Museum#RfC: "Biblical" or "Mythical" and "museum" or "facility"?
1994:
I hadn't seen the discussion notice a few sections up, but I recently created
1622:) and lots of en.wiki articles on resolutions of international organisations ( 236: 2745: 2702: 2588: 2563: 2531: 2475:
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the
2441:
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members
2298:
that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
2112: 2103: 2007: 1722: 1449:
DonaldRichardSands: you really have no judgement or self-filtering mechanism
931: 283: 202: 537:
Formal proposal to expand this Wikiproject to the wider topic of creationism
294:
Intelligent design articles have been selected for the Knowledge 0.8 release
2661: 1709:
Whole sections devoted to endless, incautious primary-sourced bureaucratic
1195: 1155: 957:. The editor in question seems intent of reinstating it, in spite of being 950: 2249:. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X. 2595:. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 1618:
There is already a French Knowledge article on that specific resolution (
994: 949:
I recently removed a month-old drive-by/undiscussed merger proposal from
160: 2356:
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
2075: 256:
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the
242: 147: 129: 2689:, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at 2252: 2200: 2067:
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to
1917: 1733: 1671: 1588: 1540: 1491: 1481: 1415: 1324: 1179: 1137: 1083: 968: 906: 888: 797: 779: 661: 638: 561: 452: 398: 1595:
and was not convinced to change the position during our discussion on
1253:
National Center for Science Education Evolution Education and the Law
1226:
I'm not sure where this came from, but it doesn't seem to be working.
592:
WT:WikiProject intelligent design/Archive 4#A creationism wikiproject?
2625: 2604: 1294: 311: 302:
for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were
963:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/True.Origin Archive (2nd nomination)
2003: 279: 238: 347:
to extend the reach of Knowledge worldwide. Please help us, with
298:
Version 0.8 is a collection of Knowledge articles selected by the
2345: 2367:
for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
344: 2415:
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
2266:
2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
2021:
Editors in this WikiProject may be interested in commenting at
1707:
NO content based upon them, so NO IT IS NOT WHAT WE DISCUSSED!
449:
and view Terra Novus/Gniniv's past activities before joining.
327:
with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's
243: 1525:
Then might I suggest that you get yourself into the habit of
2519: 1998:
and would appreciate help populating it. Many articles in
319:
Intelligent design articles and revisionIDs we have chosen
2726:
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.
2637:
It will work on a variety of links, including those from
586:
WT:WikiProject intelligent design/Archive 2#Project scope
2364: 2360:
The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
1759:. 2. Self-published sources were used without violating 1289:
you found it -- just giving its title doesn't help much.
304:
selected based on their assessed importance and quality
2382: 2376: 1972:
Knowledge:Peer review/Flying Spaghetti Monster/archive1
965:
fiasco, so cooler heads would probably be a good idea.
2613:
John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
1701:
And "I cannot call helpful" your insistence on simply
1624:
Category:United Nations General Assembly resolutions
551:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
196: 159:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 15: 2078:, will become available over the next few weeks at 2693:. Questions, comments and requests can be made at 1859:Knowledge:Peer_review/Transitional_fossil/archive1 820:Template talk:Intelligent Design#Image in template 417:, and it is in the process of getting members...-- 1990:New category for Old Earth Christian creationists 1611:as a separate article for the following reasons: 928:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Richard Sternberg 2743: 2546:Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the 1620:fr:Les dangers du créationnisme dans l'éducation 1478:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Leonard R. Brand 2351:Knowledge:WikiProject Creationism/Popular pages 2303:Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report 443:WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Cambridgeshire 27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks. 1939:Knowledge:WikiProject Religion/Manual of style 1126:Did you know that WikiProject Creationism was 554:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 2558:We have collected all of these questions at 1910:Discussion of this proposal can be found at 1285:the URL is of the link that is broken & 445:) for it. I would also suggest editors read 2599:. The idea is that it takes something like 1912:Category talk:Creationists#Proposed subcats 1023:Knowledge:WikiProject Religion/2011 meeting 2401:WikiProject collaboration notice from the 2280:Greetings WikiProject Creationism Members! 1631:Creation and evolution in public education 1605:Creation and evolution in public education 1593:Creation and evolution in public education 1122:Apparently we've been caught in a timewarp 879:Knowledge:WikiProject Creationism/Articles 2542:Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 1996:Category:Christian Old Earth creationists 1833:Transitional fossil#Improving the article 1056:Relationship between religion and science 471:, which is some sort of postmodern joke. 109:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 2577:User script to detect unreliable sources 2269: 1888:I am proposing two new subcategories of 1098:O.k., Thank you. It was just a thought. 2432:The discussion about this can be found 1802:Transitional fossil article improvement 1777:ru:Опасность_креационизма_в_образовании 1609:The dangers of creationism in education 1607:. However, I still propose to maintain 1583:The dangers of creationism in education 317:We would like to ask you to review the 2744: 2597:39th most imported script on Knowledge 2363:The report will include a link to the 1823:Removing Creationist arguments section 1664:and unreliable sources, and (ii) only 771:WikiProject Intelligent design/sandbox 507:. Please move all discussion there..-- 2181:Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 1828:NPOV on Creationist Arguments Section 1806:I've been putting some work into the 1016:Request for input in discussion forum 503:The normal proposal has been created 545:The following discussion is closed. 98: 96: 92: 2562:where you can leave your response. 1484:on me. I know you mean well -- but 852:User WikiProject Intelligent design 115:It is of interest to the following 13: 2757:NA-importance Creationism articles 2752:Project-Class Creationism articles 2687:not a script to be mindlessly used 2504:A new newsletter directory is out! 2247:Knowledge:WikiProject X/Newsletter 2217: 2164:Talk:Creation_Museum#accreditation 2074:Web tools, to replace the ones at 1581:Separate existence of the article 1295:http://www.archive.org/web/web.php 818:An Image discussion is ongoing at 599:The idea has been raised again in 413:The Wikiproject has been proposed 14: 2773: 2619:and turns it into something like 2526:and someone will add it for you. 2339:– are happy to announce that the 1897:Category:Young earth creationists 1884:Proposed new Creationist sub-cats 173:Knowledge:WikiProject Creationism 153:This page is within the scope of 2762:WikiProject Creationism articles 2514:has been created to replace the 2472:So far, 84 editors have joined. 752:The discussion above is closed. 389:WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals 201: 176:Template:WikiProject Creationism 146: 128: 97: 40:Click here to start a new topic. 2102:or contact me on my talk page. 2000:Category:Christian creationists 1890:Category:Chrsitian creationists 1853:Transitional Fossil peer-review 1755:and what exactly is covered by 1713:Self-published sources used in 1641:) 21:11, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2670:The script is mostly based on 2412:Portals are being redesigned. 2388:m:User talk:Community Tech bot 2294:2016 Community Wishlist Survey 2058:19:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC) 841:WikiProject Intelligent design 830:WikiProject intelligent design 1: 2695:User talk:Headbomb/unreliable 2135:I have submitted the article 2126:05:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC) 1985:22:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 1879:00:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 1848:07:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 1790:08:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 1744:07:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 1697:10:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 1682:03:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 1651:21:24, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 1011:00:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC) 899:05:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 808:12:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC) 790:07:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 742:18:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC) 729:10:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC) 686:13:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 672:04:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 649:04:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 572:09:57, 26 December 2010 (UTC) 167:and see a list of open tasks. 37:Put new text under old text. 2572:04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC) 2325:17:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 2261:16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2084:tool to view historical data 1903:Category:Creation scientists 1256:Nor is this one (err. 404). 979:05:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 917:07:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 869:01:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 716:10:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 702:07:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 614:My rationales for this are: 519:07:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 497:07:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 481:07:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 463:07:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 429:06:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 409:06:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 382:06:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 359:16:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 289:03:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 7: 2209:22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 2196:. Thank you for your time! 2137:Kent Hovind for peer review 1726:means you actually have to 1569:14:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 1551:05:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 1517:21:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 1502:04:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 1472:wilful ignorance of policy 1444:23:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC) 1426:11:41, 19 August 2011 (UTC) 1128:trapped in the 20th century 940:10:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC) 349:your WikiProject's feedback 45:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 2778: 2738:16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC) 2730:MediaWiki message delivery 2580: 2536:03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC) 333:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 329:articles with cleanup tags 324:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 262:Saturday, January 23, 2010 2397:17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC) 2176:19:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 2149:23:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 2063:Popular pages tool update 2035:21:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC) 1951:22:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 1933:Proposed MOS for Religion 1412:do) to take an interest. 1356:13:58, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 1335:10:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 1281:You really need to state 1272:08:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 1242:08:44, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 1204:21:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 1190:05:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 1176:not a fan of lime-green. 1164:20:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC) 1148:13:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 141: 123: 75:Be welcoming to newcomers 2691:User:Headbomb/unreliable 2611:. Accessed 2020-02-14. ( 2583:User:Headbomb/unreliable 2499:07:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 2189:review the proposal here 2012:22:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC) 1966:Flying Spaghetti Monster 1958:Flying Spaghetti Monster 1928:08:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 1277:Wekn reven i susej eht: 1114:14:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 1094:12:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 1074:11:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 754:Please do not modify it. 548:Please do not modify it. 258:WP 1.0 assessment system 2484:WikiProject's talk page 2455:On April 8th, 2018, an 2424:Transclude lead excerpt 2395:the Community Tech Team 2131:Kent Hovind peer review 1816:examples in the article 274:WP 1.0 project homepage 252:WP 1.0 bot announcement 156:WikiProject Creationism 25:WikiProject Creationism 2633:. Accessed 2020-02-14. 2274: 2222: 2214:WikiProject X is live! 2154:RfC re Creation Museum 1723:"SIGNIFICANT COVERAGE" 1597:the relevant talk page 1366:The conflict level on 1297:, to see if it can be 1045:at 15:44, 5 April 2011 70:avoid personal attacks 2685:Do note that this is 2273: 2221: 2080:toollabs:popularpages 1715:blatant violation of 1705:secondary sources -- 1307:ed, or tag it with a 1134:starting work on it. 1058:be on the list, too? 1039:Project Messenger Bot 1037:Automated message by 345:Knowledge for Schools 2530:– Sent on behalf of 2524:template's talk page 2516:old, out-of-date one 2511:Newsletter directory 2331:Popular pages report 1601:the relevant section 955:TalkOrigins Archive‎ 469:Interpretive science 341:One Laptop per Child 179:Creationism articles 2403:Portals WikiProject 2158:A discussion about 2069:Wikimedia Tool Labs 1969:for peer review at 1864:Transitional fossil 1808:Transitional fossil 1752:20 minutes (France) 1488:keep away from me. 2593:predatory journals 2589:unreliable sources 2477:newsletter archive 2374:We're grateful to 2346:Community Tech bot 2275: 2223: 1963:Hi! I have listed 1561:DonaldRichardSands 1509:DonaldRichardSands 1474:will not be missed 1436:DonaldRichardSands 984:Featured articles? 300:Knowledge 1.0 team 111:content assessment 81:dispute resolution 42: 2626:Article of things 2605:Article of things 2494:The Transhumanist 2380:for his original 2341:Popular pages bot 2327: 2199: 1899:, and within it: 1633:becomes too long. 1559:I agree. Thanks. 1354: 1349:reven i susej eht 1270: 1265:reven i susej eht 1240: 1235:reven i susej eht 1112: 1107:reven i susej eht 1072: 1067:reven i susej eht 867: 287: 249: 248: 230: 229: 195: 194: 191: 190: 187: 186: 91: 90: 61:Assume good faith 38: 2769: 2727: 2722: 2666: 2660: 2656: 2650: 2646: 2640: 2628: 2614: 2560:this Google form 2497: 2428: 2422: 2385: 2379: 2348: 2322: 2295: 2225:Hello everyone! 2197: 2123: 2076:tools:~alexz/pop 1926: 1742: 1680: 1549: 1500: 1431:Leonard R. Brand 1424: 1410: 1392: 1369:Leonard R. Brand 1362:Leonard R. Brand 1353: 1351: 1346: 1333: 1316: 1310: 1306: 1300: 1269: 1267: 1262: 1239: 1237: 1232: 1188: 1146: 1111: 1109: 1104: 1092: 1071: 1069: 1064: 1050:Another Article? 1007: 1002: 997: 977: 915: 897: 863: 856: 850: 845: 839: 834: 828: 814:Image discussion 806: 788: 775: 769: 700: 695: 670: 647: 570: 550: 517: 512: 495: 490: 461: 427: 422: 407: 380: 375: 277: 244: 216: 215: 205: 197: 181: 180: 177: 174: 171: 150: 143: 142: 132: 125: 124: 102: 101: 100: 93: 16: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2742: 2741: 2725: 2701: 2664: 2658: 2654: 2648: 2644: 2638: 2624: 2612: 2585: 2579: 2544: 2506: 2490: 2453: 2426: 2420: 2406: 2381: 2375: 2344: 2333: 2293: 2283: 2268: 2216: 2183: 2162:is underway at 2160:Creation Museum 2156: 2133: 2111: 2065: 2042: 2019: 2017:RfC of interest 1992: 1961: 1956:Peer Review of 1935: 1924: 1915: 1886: 1855: 1804: 1740: 1731: 1678: 1669: 1586: 1547: 1538: 1498: 1489: 1466:WP:DEADHORSEing 1422: 1413: 1383: 1367: 1364: 1347: 1342: 1331: 1322: 1314: 1312:broken citation 1308: 1304: 1298: 1263: 1258: 1233: 1228: 1216: 1186: 1177: 1144: 1135: 1124: 1105: 1100: 1090: 1081: 1065: 1060: 1052: 1046: 1018: 1005: 1000: 995: 990:assessment page 986: 975: 966: 947: 945:Merger proposal 924: 913: 904: 895: 886: 876: 861:KillerChihuahua 854: 848: 843: 837: 832: 826: 816: 804: 795: 786: 777: 773: 767: 763: 758: 757: 750: 696: 691: 668: 659: 656: 645: 636: 579: 568: 559: 546: 539: 513: 508: 491: 486: 459: 450: 423: 418: 405: 396: 376: 371: 368: 306:, then article 296: 254: 245: 239: 210: 178: 175: 172: 169: 168: 87: 86: 56: 23:for discussing 12: 11: 5: 2775: 2765: 2764: 2759: 2754: 2728:Delivered by: 2635: 2634: 2631:Deprecated.com 2617: 2616: 2609:Deprecated.com 2578: 2575: 2543: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2505: 2502: 2452: 2449: 2405: 2399: 2393:Warm regards, 2372: 2371: 2368: 2365:pageviews tool 2361: 2337:Community Tech 2332: 2329: 2317:Best regards, 2306: 2305: 2277: 2267: 2264: 2215: 2212: 2182: 2179: 2155: 2152: 2132: 2129: 2064: 2061: 2041: 2040:Merge proposal 2038: 2018: 2015: 1991: 1988: 1960: 1954: 1934: 1931: 1920: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1885: 1882: 1867: 1866: 1861: 1854: 1851: 1836: 1835: 1830: 1825: 1803: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1757:Deutsche Welle 1736: 1674: 1656: 1654: 1653: 1627: 1616: 1585: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1554: 1553: 1543: 1520: 1519: 1494: 1418: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1327: 1319: 1318: 1290: 1276: 1251: 1250: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1182: 1170:KISS principle 1140: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1086: 1051: 1048: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1017: 1014: 985: 982: 971: 946: 943: 923: 920: 909: 891: 875: 872: 858: 857: 846: 835: 815: 812: 811: 810: 800: 792: 782: 762: 759: 751: 749: 746: 745: 744: 731: 718: 704: 688: 674: 664: 655: 652: 641: 634: 633: 630: 627: 624: 605: 604: 597: 596: 595: 589: 588:by John Carter 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 564: 541: 540: 538: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 473:Dylan Flaherty 455: 434: 433: 432: 431: 401: 367: 362: 295: 292: 253: 250: 247: 246: 241: 237: 235: 232: 231: 228: 227: 222: 212: 211: 206: 200: 193: 192: 189: 188: 185: 184: 182: 165:the discussion 151: 139: 138: 133: 121: 120: 114: 103: 89: 88: 85: 84: 77: 72: 63: 57: 55: 54: 43: 34: 33: 30: 29: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2774: 2763: 2760: 2758: 2755: 2753: 2750: 2749: 2747: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2723: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2698: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2683: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672:WP:RSPSOURCES 2668: 2663: 2653: 2643: 2632: 2627: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2584: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2555: 2553: 2549: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2501: 2500: 2496: 2495: 2487: 2485: 2480: 2478: 2473: 2470: 2467: 2465: 2460: 2458: 2448: 2446: 2445: 2439: 2437: 2436: 2430: 2425: 2416: 2413: 2410: 2404: 2398: 2396: 2391: 2389: 2384: 2378: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2354: 2352: 2349:will post at 2347: 2342: 2338: 2328: 2326: 2320: 2315: 2312: 2309: 2304: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2297: 2296: 2289: 2288:one-time-only 2284: 2282: 2281: 2272: 2263: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2238: 2233: 2232: 2231:WikiProject X 2226: 2220: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2178: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2128: 2127: 2122: 2121: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2096: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2072: 2070: 2060: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1967: 1959: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1923: 1919: 1913: 1904: 1901: 1900: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1891: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1817: 1811: 1809: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1739: 1735: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1718: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1677: 1673: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1584: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1548: 1546: 1542: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1499: 1497: 1493: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1421: 1417: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1391: 1387: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1357: 1352: 1350: 1345: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1330: 1326: 1313: 1303: 1296: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1268: 1266: 1261: 1254: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1238: 1236: 1231: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1185: 1181: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1143: 1139: 1133: 1129: 1115: 1110: 1108: 1103: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1070: 1068: 1063: 1057: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1003: 998: 991: 981: 980: 976: 974: 970: 964: 960: 956: 952: 942: 941: 937: 933: 929: 919: 918: 914: 912: 908: 901: 900: 896: 894: 890: 884: 880: 874:Articles page 871: 870: 866: 862: 853: 847: 842: 836: 831: 825: 824: 823: 821: 809: 805: 803: 799: 793: 791: 787: 785: 781: 772: 765: 764: 755: 743: 739: 735: 732: 730: 726: 722: 719: 717: 713: 709: 705: 703: 699: 694: 689: 687: 683: 679: 675: 673: 669: 667: 663: 658: 657: 651: 650: 646: 644: 640: 631: 628: 625: 621: 617: 616: 615: 612: 610: 602: 598: 593: 590: 587: 584: 583: 581: 580: 573: 569: 567: 563: 557: 556: 555: 552: 549: 543: 542: 520: 516: 511: 506: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 494: 489: 484: 483: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 460: 458: 454: 448: 444: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 430: 426: 421: 416: 412: 411: 410: 406: 404: 400: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 383: 379: 374: 366: 361: 360: 357: 352: 350: 346: 342: 336: 334: 330: 326: 325: 320: 315: 313: 309: 305: 301: 291: 290: 285: 281: 275: 271: 270:summary table 267: 263: 259: 234: 233: 226: 223: 221: 218: 217: 214: 213: 209: 204: 199: 198: 183: 166: 162: 158: 157: 152: 149: 145: 144: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 126: 122: 118: 112: 108: 104: 95: 94: 82: 78: 76: 73: 71: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 52: 48: 47:Learn to edit 44: 41: 36: 35: 32: 31: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2724: 2699: 2686: 2684: 2680:WP:CITEWATCH 2669: 2652:cite journal 2636: 2630: 2623:John Smith " 2618: 2608: 2603:John Smith " 2586: 2556: 2545: 2509: 2507: 2492: 2489:Thank you. 2488: 2481: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2461: 2454: 2442: 2440: 2433: 2431: 2417: 2414: 2411: 2407: 2392: 2373: 2355: 2334: 2319:Stevietheman 2316: 2313: 2310: 2307: 2291: 2287: 2285: 2279: 2278: 2276: 2251: 2242: 2241: 2237:check us out 2229: 2227: 2224: 2187: 2184: 2157: 2134: 2117: 2116: 2097: 2073: 2066: 2046:the proposal 2043: 2020: 1993: 1970: 1964: 1962: 1936: 1916: 1909: 1887: 1868: 1837: 1812: 1805: 1764: 1761:WP:ABOUTSELF 1750: 1732: 1727: 1721: 1717:WP:ABOUTSELF 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1670: 1665: 1655: 1629:The article 1608: 1587: 1582: 1539: 1535:particularly 1534: 1530: 1526: 1490: 1485: 1473: 1469: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1429: 1414: 1365: 1348: 1343: 1323: 1320: 1286: 1282: 1275: 1264: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1247: 1234: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1178: 1173: 1136: 1131: 1125: 1106: 1101: 1082: 1066: 1061: 1053: 1019: 993: 987: 967: 958: 951:Talk.origins 948: 926:Please see: 925: 905: 902: 887: 877: 859: 817: 796: 778: 753: 721:Totnesmartin 660: 637: 635: 613: 611:will apply. 606: 560: 553: 547: 544: 451: 447:this comment 397: 369: 356:SelectionBot 353: 337: 322: 316: 307: 297: 261: 255: 207: 164: 154: 117:WikiProjects 107:project page 106: 19:This is the 2581:Main page: 2520:WikiSpecies 2462:There's an 2323:Delivered: 2100:updated FAQ 1943:John Carter 1529:a talkpage 1043:John Carter 1027:John Carter 922:Project AfD 623:precursors. 393:User:Gniniv 314:algorithm. 170:Creationism 161:Creationism 136:Creationism 2746:Categories 2548:WP 1.0 Bot 2451:Background 2286:This is a 2141:Harizotoh9 2027:Tryptofish 1871:Harizotoh9 1840:Harizotoh9 1662:WP:PRIMARY 1589:User:Hrafn 1533:you post, 1482:kryptonite 1451:whatsoever 1054:Shouldn't 761:Discussion 734:Cerebellum 678:Taiwan boi 654:Supporting 609:WP:SILENCE 594:by myself. 266:WP 1.0 bot 2194:talk page 2050:IRWolfie- 1977:Guy Macon 1214:Dead Link 883:WP:BOLDly 312:WikiTrust 276:. — Carl 225:Archive 2 220:Archive 1 83:if needed 66:Be polite 21:talk page 2703:Headbomb 2676:WP:NPPSG 2642:cite web 2564:Walkerma 2552:web tool 2532:Headbomb 2383:Mr.Z-bot 2377:Mr.Z-man 2104:Mr.Z-bot 1780:telling. 1461:trivia, 1340:Thanks! 932:Wolfview 748:Opposing 620:WP:MERGE 308:versions 208:Archives 51:get help 2168:S. Rich 2110:) (for 1765:TRIVIA! 1711:TRIVIA! 1703:listing 1527:reading 1470:endless 1463:endless 1459:endless 1455:endless 1386:protect 1381:history 1302:wayback 1196:Arlen22 1156:Arlen22 708:Charles 618:Taking 2508:A new 1782:Fuseau 1769:Fuseau 1689:Fuseau 1643:Fuseau 1635:Fuseau 1531:before 1486:please 1468:, and 1390:delete 1219:Parody 1174:really 1132:before 953:& 865:Advice 698:Orator 515:Orator 493:Orator 425:Orator 378:Orator 365:WP:YEC 264:, the 113:scale. 2335:We – 2253:Harej 2243:Note: 2201:Harej 2092:OAuth 1922:Stalk 1918:Hrafn 1738:Stalk 1734:Hrafn 1676:Stalk 1672:Hrafn 1666:lists 1603:) of 1545:Stalk 1541:Hrafn 1496:Stalk 1492:Hrafn 1420:Stalk 1416:Hrafn 1407:views 1399:watch 1395:links 1344:Wekn 1329:Stalk 1325:Hrafn 1287:where 1260:Wekn 1248:Legal 1230:Wekn 1184:Stalk 1180:Hrafn 1142:Stalk 1138:Hrafn 1102:Wekn 1088:Stalk 1084:Hrafn 1062:Wekn 1041:from 973:Stalk 969:Hrafn 959:still 911:Stalk 907:Hrafn 893:Stalk 889:Hrafn 802:Stalk 798:Hrafn 784:Stalk 780:Hrafn 693:Novus 666:Stalk 662:Hrafn 643:Stalk 639:Hrafn 566:Stalk 562:Hrafn 510:Novus 488:Novus 457:Stalk 453:Hrafn 420:Novus 403:Stalk 399:Hrafn 373:Novus 260:. On 105:This 79:Seek 2734:talk 2678:and 2657:and 2591:and 2568:talk 2444:here 2435:here 2257:talk 2205:talk 2172:talk 2166:. – 2145:talk 2108:talk 2054:talk 2031:talk 2025:. -- 2008:talk 1981:talk 1947:talk 1875:talk 1844:talk 1786:talk 1773:talk 1693:talk 1647:talk 1639:talk 1565:talk 1513:talk 1440:talk 1403:logs 1377:talk 1373:edit 1283:what 1200:talk 1160:talk 1031:talk 936:talk 738:talk 725:talk 712:talk 682:talk 505:here 477:talk 415:here 343:and 284:talk 68:and 2700:- 2662:doi 2120:man 2113:Mr. 2088:now 2004:BDD 1728:USE 351:! 280:CBM 2748:: 2736:) 2717:· 2713:· 2709:· 2697:. 2674:, 2667:. 2665:}} 2659:{{ 2655:}} 2649:{{ 2647:, 2645:}} 2639:{{ 2629:" 2607:" 2570:) 2534:. 2491:— 2486:. 2479:. 2466:. 2438:. 2429:. 2427:}} 2421:{{ 2390:. 2321:— 2259:) 2207:) 2174:) 2147:) 2124:) 2118:Z- 2056:) 2048:. 2033:) 2010:) 1983:) 1949:) 1914:. 1892:: 1877:) 1846:) 1838:-- 1788:) 1695:) 1649:) 1626:). 1567:) 1515:) 1442:) 1405:| 1401:| 1397:| 1393:| 1388:| 1384:| 1379:| 1375:| 1317:). 1315:}} 1309:{{ 1305:}} 1299:{{ 1202:) 1162:) 1033:) 1006:tk 1001:tk 996:tk 938:) 855:}} 849:{{ 844:}} 838:{{ 833:}} 827:{{ 774:}} 768:{{ 740:) 727:) 714:) 706:-- 690:-- 684:) 676:-- 479:) 282:· 49:; 2732:( 2721:} 2719:b 2715:p 2711:c 2707:t 2705:{ 2615:) 2566:( 2255:( 2203:( 2170:( 2143:( 2106:( 2052:( 2029:( 2006:( 1979:( 1945:( 1873:( 1842:( 1784:( 1771:( 1719:. 1691:( 1645:( 1637:( 1563:( 1511:( 1438:( 1409:) 1371:( 1198:( 1158:( 1029:( 934:( 930:. 736:( 723:( 710:( 680:( 603:. 475:( 286:) 278:( 119:: 53:.

Index

talk page
WikiProject Creationism
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Creationism
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Creationism
Creationism
the discussion

Archive 1
Archive 2
WP 1.0 assessment system
WP 1.0 bot
summary table
WP 1.0 project homepage
CBM
talk
03:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Knowledge 1.0 team
selected based on their assessed importance and quality

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.