312:; it is important to be reasonably sure that there is little or no chance of accidentally excluding significant input or perspectives, or changing the weight of different views, if closed early. Especially, closers should beware of interpreting "early pile on" as necessarily showing how a discussion will end up. This can sometimes happen when a topic attracts high levels of attention from those engaged (or having a specific view) but slower attention from other less involved editors, perhaps with other points of view. It can sometimes be better to allow a few extra days even if current discussion seems very clearly to hold one opinion, to be sure that it really will be a snowball and as a courtesy to be sure that no significant input will be excluded if closed very soon. Cases like this are more about judgment than rules, however.
147:
289:
39:
128:
220:
is extremely difficult but potentially winnable. In cases of genuine contention in the
Knowledge community, it is best to settle the dispute through discussion and debate. This should not be done merely to assuage complaints that process wasn't followed, but to produce a correct outcome, which often
315:
The idea behind the snowball clause is to not waste editor time, but this also must be balanced with giving editors in the minority due process. Be cautious of snow closing discussions that normally run for a certain amount of time, that have had recent activity, or that are not nearly unanimous.
274:
If an issue is "snowballed", and somebody later raises a reasonable objection, then it probably was not a good candidate for the snowball clause. Nevertheless, if the objection raised is unreasonable or contrary to policy, then the debate needs to be refocused, and editors may be advised to
207:
The snowball clause is not policy, and there are sometimes good reasons for pushing ahead against the flames anyway; well-aimed snowballs have, on rare occasions, made it through the inferno to reach their marks. The clause should be seen as a polite request not to waste everyone's time.
191:
The snowball clause is designed to prevent editors from getting tangled up in long, mind-numbing, bureaucratic discussions over things that are foregone conclusions. For example, if an article is speedily deleted for the wrong reason (the reason was not within the
258:
Sometimes the support for a proposal is so overwhelming or so obvious that it has a snowball's chance in hell of failing. Such proposals may also be suitable for SNOW closure, with the same care and considerations that apply to that of failing proposals.
221:
requires that the full process be followed. Allowing a process to continue to its conclusion may allow for a more reasoned discourse, ensure that all arguments are fully examined, and maintain a sense of fairness. However,
140:
of success, use common sense and don't follow the process all the way to the end, just for procedural sake. But if there are any doubts, do not terminate the process prematurely.
267:
This test can be applied to an action only after it is performed, as the lack of snowballs in hell is not an absolute, and is thus useful for learning from experience.
456:
308:
if a particular outcome is merely "likely" or "quite likely", and there is a genuine and reasoned basis for disagreement. This is because discussions are
222:
271:
If an issue is run through some process and the resulting decision is unanimous, then it might have been a candidate for the snowball clause.
28:
47:
51:
340:
193:
478:
361:
400:
17:
64:
387:
197:
184:
63:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
351:
325:
68:
201:
211:
483:
335:
168:
55:
330:
425:
292:
Sometimes, the fate of the snowball may not be immediately obvious and predictable until it has
100:
356:
242:
187:
of being accepted by a certain process, there's no need to run it through the entire process.
107:
93:
249:
8:
86:
367:
309:
234:
78:
345:
436:
276:
172:
204:
the article and force everyone to go through the motions of deleting it again.
176:
472:
452:
408:
283:
262:
146:
288:
413:
reported by
Schwegler et al., in Physical Review Letters, 13 March 2000
297:
440:
154:
27:"WP:SNOW" redirects here. For the snow sports WikiProject, see
374:
228:
150:
319:
296:
been placed in the infernal conditions. This calls for an
223:
process for its own sake is not part of
Knowledge policy
348:, an RFA-specific application of the snowball clause
167:is one way that editors are encouraged to exercise
364:(a satirical essay lampooning the snowball clause)
196:), but the article has no chance of surviving the
470:
407:. American Institute of Physics. Archived from
29:Knowledge:WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding
277:avoid disrupting Knowledge to make a point
287:
145:
52:Knowledge:Knowledge is not a bureaucracy
451:
14:
471:
370:, antithetical Meta policy on Snowball
179:behavior. The snowball clause states:
458:A dictionary of proper names and ...
122:
33:
24:
69:thoroughly vetted by the community
65:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
495:
390:(Dilbert comic strip 2003-07-05)
126:
37:
212:What the snowball clause is not
153:. Note the complete absence of
445:
426:"Chance for snowballs in hell"
418:
393:
381:
13:
1:
306:may not always be appropriate
479:Knowledge supplemental pages
341:Jamaican Bobsled Team clause
194:criteria for speedy deletion
7:
362:Steamroll minority opinions
200:, it would be pointless to
10:
500:
232:
76:
56:Knowledge:Ignore all rules
26:
185:snowball's chance in hell
138:snowball's chance in hell
300:to be conducted in full.
136:If a process only has a
134:This page in a nutshell:
198:normal deletion process
453:Toynbee, Paget Jackson
411:on 27 September 2012.
301:
189:
158:
435:, 182 (19 May 1994);
405:Physics News Graphics
291:
181:
149:
461:The Clarendon Press.
352:Process is important
304:The snowball clause
401:"Snowballs in Hell"
326:Closing discussions
67:as it has not been
302:
183:If an issue has a
159:
18:Knowledge:SNOWBALL
484:Knowledge culture
284:A cautionary note
263:The snowball test
144:
143:
120:Explanatory essay
118:
117:
48:explanatory essay
16:(Redirected from
491:
463:
462:
449:
443:
441:10.1038/369182a0
424:David A. Paige,
422:
416:
415:
397:
391:
385:
336:Ignore all rules
252:
245:
130:
129:
123:
110:
103:
96:
89:
41:
40:
34:
21:
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
490:
489:
488:
469:
468:
467:
466:
450:
446:
423:
419:
399:
398:
394:
388:A Lucky Snowman
386:
382:
377:
331:Deletion policy
322:
286:
265:
256:
255:
248:
241:
237:
231:
214:
164:snowball clause
127:
121:
114:
113:
106:
99:
92:
85:
81:
73:
72:
38:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
497:
487:
486:
481:
465:
464:
444:
417:
392:
379:
378:
376:
373:
372:
371:
365:
359:
354:
349:
343:
338:
333:
328:
321:
318:
285:
282:
281:
280:
272:
264:
261:
254:
253:
246:
238:
233:
230:
227:
213:
210:
142:
141:
131:
119:
116:
115:
112:
111:
104:
97:
90:
82:
77:
74:
62:
61:
44:
42:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
496:
485:
482:
480:
477:
476:
474:
460:
459:
454:
448:
442:
438:
434:
431:
427:
421:
414:
410:
406:
402:
396:
389:
384:
380:
369:
368:Meta:Snowball
366:
363:
360:
358:
355:
353:
350:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
323:
317:
313:
311:
307:
299:
295:
290:
278:
273:
270:
269:
268:
260:
251:
247:
244:
240:
239:
236:
226:
224:
219:
218:uphill battle
209:
205:
203:
199:
195:
188:
186:
180:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
156:
152:
148:
139:
135:
132:
125:
124:
109:
105:
102:
101:WP:SNOWCLAUSE
98:
95:
91:
88:
84:
83:
80:
75:
70:
66:
59:
57:
53:
49:
43:
36:
35:
30:
19:
457:
447:
432:
429:
420:
412:
409:the original
404:
395:
383:
314:
305:
303:
293:
266:
257:
243:WP:AVALANCHE
217:
215:
206:
190:
182:
177:bureaucratic
169:common sense
163:
162:
160:
137:
133:
108:WP:SNOWCLOSE
45:
357:Speedy keep
94:WP:SNOWBALL
46:This is an
473:Categories
375:References
298:experiment
250:WP:SNOWPRO
171:and avoid
50:about the
310:not votes
235:Shortcuts
229:Avalanche
202:resurrect
155:snowballs
79:Shortcuts
455:(1898).
320:See also
294:actually
58:policies
346:Not now
87:WP:SNOW
430:Nature
173:pointy
161:The
151:Hell
54:and
437:doi
433:369
216:An
475::
428:,
403:.
225:.
175:,
60:.
439::
279:.
157:.
71:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
