User talk:Ed Poor/Archive 3

2771: 3345: 31: 2621:, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as 3924: 3978: 3524: 1474: 2721: 1303: 4186: 3377: 1050: 2958: 2921: 2878: 2399: 1953: 1640: 1228: 603: 360: 188: 110: 2563: 4260: 4227: 3943:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3111:, it's almost impossible to believe you hadn't read the existing article, given that the lede is almost identical to the quote you added. I know that at Conservapedia you have a habit of creating articles with quotations, but at WP, you should at least read what already exists. In addition, adding a quote in the way you did doesn't fit with 1608:

think she even noticed me. I kept my distance until she had completed the maneuver, which took several minutes owing to the difficulty of operating the manual gear shift, the clutch, the brake and the accelerator, and the steering wheel while holding a mobile phone and trying to keep up a conversation.

4439:

I don't see a reason to delay the split. The move was a while ago and no one seems to be objecting. Just remember to attribute the text you move to the new article. Also, I don't make the decision on splitting, the editors involved do. In this case you will only discover if there are objections by

2346:

Yes, that's what I was trying to say. Since it didn't seem clear to you, I reiterate that you should read a bit about plagiarism. Obviously Knowledge is a bit more tolerant in that respect than academia, but still not as much as most people believe, and as I said in the beginning most students aren't

2129:

Not to pile on, but why do you think the Wegman report is in the public domain? It may very well be, but there is no obvious reason for this assumption. In particular, it's not been created by the US government or government employees in their official capacity. Unless it has been explicitly released

149:

The problem with Knowledge is that so many details are incorrect, and left uncorrected for - well, basically forever unless someone comes along to correct them. We need a system of fact-checking. It can't just be, "Anyone can edit any article anytime." That makes the default "No one says it's wrong."

4540:

is the egg of a louse), because when my daughter was 3 years old I found her on the front porch one day with a box full of insects she had collected from the lawn. I had no idea why she would be interested in bugs. It wasn't till several hours later that I recalled having told my wife about going to

2274:

No, that's wrong. If that's the diff that I remember (I don't want to hunt down the Wegman report again to compare the text and see if that's the diff that lifts entire paragraphs from it without quotation marks), then it's definitely plagiarism in addition to the copyvio. A reasonable reader seeing

329:

So how is everything? Everything going well with the church? I've haven't been a regular attendee to the Meetups in about two years due to problems getting into the city (though I did attend the meeting back in May), but haven't seen you at any since that first picnic at which we met in August 2007.

3626:

You are right, things have changed since the early days. From 2001 to 2004, I would just create a stub and watch with joy as others jumped in and did 90% of the work. I started about 1,100 articles that way (which still exist). But nowadays, people want to see much more work done before the initial

1607:

I once walked down one of those narrow side streets in the City of London, the financial district where the old walled city used to be, and encountered a very busy-looking lady in a car. She was trying to turn the car round in this narrow street while simultaneously talking on a cellphone. I don't

1066:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

490:

I think, based on the number of references to the concept of independent review I've been able to find in just an hour or so of Googling, that it is relevant to Knowledge. Whether it's relevant to accusations that CRU engaged in misconduct is an editorial judgment. I won't edit war with you, if you

1544:

I don't think a block is necessary at this time, as I intend to pull back and think about what is required of me before getting into climate again. I appreciate the warning, and I hope when I've had a chance to study it all, I can consult you before I contemplate any additional edits in this area.

3568:

I didn't help save this article as any kind of favor to you, please note. Too many of your subsequent edits are in style that I and others found so problematic (even if I disagreed with others about whether the problems constituted grounds for deletion.) In the current style of the article, they

1801:

The two different viewpoints are (1) that there are no innate differences and (2) that there are innate differences. I'd like to see both viewpoints included in the series of articles you plan to edit. Using a source with the word "Delusions" in its title is good for presenting the first POV, but

1745:

It seems that book has already examined the question of whether there are innate differences between men and women and decided that there aren't. I suppose the basis for this conclusion is (A) the assumption that biology is all there is, since nothing supernatural is possible, or capable of being

1698:

by Cordelia Fine, which I recommend if you're interested in the question of whether there are innate psychological differences between the genders. I learned from that book that there are some physiological differences in the brain, but they're slight and the significance of them and whether they

3297:

edit? A signed, uncited, POV-pushing edit on an article - not the talk page - breaks so many rules I can't even begin to enumerate them! If you were a n00b, it might be excusable, but for somebody who has been around as long as you have I can't even begin to comprehend what you were trying to do

3440:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

3044:

Sorry if my original question was unclear: I'm not really talking about POV issues - I was asking if it was meant to appear that way (cosmetically) - the bullet point, the fragmentary nature, disrupts the flow of the lead. I would try to repair myself, but figured you would be better equipped.

2347:

even aware when they plagiarise because they don't understand the concept. But I am glad everything seems to be cleared up now. If you remember any specific other cases in the past it would be nice if you could fix them, but so long as there are no further copyvios it's not a big deal at all.

3019:

I think Knowledge should be neutral, rather than endorsing or promoting the "leftist" POV that the US was wrong. I think the article should just say that opposed the US practice, on certain grounds (such as treaties or international law); while supported the US practice on certain other

4090:

About the article, though, I feel it's useful because various "anti-cult" or "counter-cult" people have used the cult checklists as evidence in their arguments that various religious groups were "cults" in the sense of brainwashing hapless victims into joining something which harms them

4356:

I understand that you are under rather strict, general editing restrictions after two arbcom cases. I will request that the editing restrictions will be more specific and less strict. I really do not understand the talk page restrictions. But of course, do not expect miracles from me.

791:

and if he fixes it you can avoid the whole issue of whether to bother to add a sic :-) BTW if we were unable to check the source, you probably should have either changed it to case or let it be, since adding a 'sic' arguably has BLP issues if the writer is alive (I'm only semi joking).

3148:

I generally prefer to let other writers speak for themselves, especially when they say something better than any free-licensed summary can. Often the experts really know what they're talking about. Not always, of course, but when they do let's take advantage of their expertise.

3013:

You expect me to remember precisely what I was thinking that far back? I probably was just trying to add a few quotes about international law as background. There's a dispute over whether the US was "wrong" in all cases when it defoliated areas of Vietnam during the

706: 2219:

public domain (that text probably wasn't) would be fine. But doing it in a way that doesn't make it obvious that it's copied literally and maybe superficially rephrased still makes it plagiarism, which is much less critical than a copyvio but still not allowed.

3025:

If I recall correctly, the article had leaned toward siding with "America was wrong" POV before I started, and I was probably trying to make it just be neutral: not saying America was right, not saying it was wrong: just describing each viewpoint accurately.

551:

Well, I certainly won't object if you choose to revert it with no further explanation. But I've asked in 2 or 3 places for an explanation, only to get a repeated assertion of irrelevance. Or have you already replied elsewhere? Sorry if I missed your answer.

485:. Can you explain the difference? (I had thought that the sources I've been reading were talking about independent review as a check against bias, including ideological bias. If I've misread a source or left out an essential reference, please correct me.) 3430:) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the 2671:

Did you really think the way to challenge a ban from editing talk pages relating to the Unification Church was to... edit such a talk page? You used to be a crat, you had to know that wouldn't end well, instead of following protocol and appealing to

787:

Well it's your user page so you decide :-P Anyway looking more closely, you linked to the source which does have 'cast' so a sic would probably be in order if you want people to know it wasn't you. Looking even more closely, you can email the writer

2149:

Thank you for those clarifications. You are saying that Knowledge policy and/or the free license concept, as applied to collaborative writing, does not permit incorporating public domain text. It must be quoted. Do I understand you correctly, Hans?

818:

Actually looking more closely, it's not clear if the author wrote that himself or his simply quoting the source. I think it's the later since otherwise most of the essay is just a bunch of quotes, and the source is simply the reference he's using.

4004:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

3550:

4143:

I used to be able to describe any view on any topic, but I found that some people who prefer exalting a popular view to the neglect of less popular views have found a way to game the system and evade NPOV. When I pointed this out, they accused

4252:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

4122:" (a concept unique to Knowledge editorial policy, as evidenced by the red link in this sentence) will be used to suppress any viewpoint that runs counter to the mainstream. I would think that as long as we are clear that we are not giving 3409:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 504:, at least not in the sense of violating NPOV guidelines. I believe it is within the rules to start a new page about something, even if it is destined to become a section of a larger article. There is already a consensus of 4 editors (see 463:, but that article's not actually relevant to the kind of independent review arranged for the Climatic Research Unit issues. Are you thinking of making major revisions so that independent review becomes relevant and is no longer a fork of 4104:

Or for those who take the opposite POV, the history of how cults eventually find a way to get away with it. Either way, we should keep it for the sake of describing the controversy ... assuming a neutral approach is what we're looking

3569:

stick out like sore thumbs -- or worse, as presenting potentially dominant themes when it's not clear what theme, if any (race, class, sexual orientation, gender, and that's not the end of it) should be most prominent in this article.

4297:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

2531: 3811:

Thanks. Yes, it just needs some good examples adding with cites to complete that new section. You already gave one example on talk. It might prove hard to be brief on saying why/how they are marginalised, however. cheers

4008:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

3554:

1916:, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection 3789: 1449: 1430: 1778:

I agree, it should definitely be "we don't know," though it's still useful to include information about the studies and experiments that have been done, even if they haven't come to any definitive conclusions.

1853:“The whole history of science has been the gradual realization that events do not happen in an arbitrary manner, but that they reflect a certain underlying order, which may or may not be divinely inspired.” - 1335: 4406: 2371:

Hi, I've reverted your edits on the above page. I've said why on the talk page. Please feel free to respond, but please put all comments on the talk page so they're gathered together and available to all.

1802:

let's make sure not to assume that this is the only viewpoint, or that we should give it primacy because it's "scientific" or anything like that. NPOV policy requires us to describe all viewpoints fairly. --

1699:

actually contribute to any psychological differences at all is totally unknown, because we don't understand the brain well enough and it's difficult to know how much it is affected by environmental factors.

4521:

I didn't expect it was. As I wrote, Stephan is fine. I'm less a stickler for formality than for correctness. I am a professional nit-picker (otherwise known as a theoretical computer scientist), after all.

3479:

If (like me) you've never heard of him there's nothing in the article to indicate why he should be in wikipedia, i.e. the article "does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject".

3442: 2102:

what plagiarism means. 50% of American graduate students haven't go a clue and think it's acceptable to incorporate a sentence almost literally into their text so long as they add a citation to the source.

157:

writers or editors have checked it and have affirmed that it is correct. Contrary to the longstanding objections to this idea, it will actually improve both our editorial freedom and our article quality.

2652:

I don't think that responding to a request to comment, with a query about whether others want the ban lifted, warrants a block. I will simply resume keeping quiet, as I have done for the past 14 months.

2070:

are shown in proper contrast to the minority views. I wouldn't want anything unscientific to be added to a science article, but rather a dissenting scientific view if it's in accordance with our project

1530:

I apologize for this indiscretion, and as I mentioned to Stephen above, I intend to avoid this area until I understand what the committee deem to be appropriate behavior. Although I felt that I was only

374: 984: 2633:. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee." 1505:. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at 4180: 2006:

I request that you voluntarily stop editing climate change articles for the time being. The fact that you plagiarized Wegman's report and then reported astonishment about the self-same plagiarism at

3591:

I don't care if you were one of the first N people to edit Knowledge. Protocol and style guidelines have evolved since those early days, and Knowledge is clearly the better for it. I'm not after

662: 617: 4161:

Perhaps the atmosphere will change in coming years, but until then I must be extra careful. The idea of "assume good faith" is lost, and if I make even one mistake in a year, they jump on me. --

4194: 1702:

I'd like to add a lot of the studies and information I learned about from this book into the articles on Knowledge, but the subject is all kind of spread out in different articles. I worked on

161:

We have lost a ton of writers who have given up because it's so hard to maintain article quality when good edits can be reverted and bad edits inserted more easily than the other way around. --

3423: 2516:

Ironically, in the old days I was considered a model of neutrality, even on my own church, and my fellow contributors were begging me to write more about my church's teachings and so forth. --

1667:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —

2748:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

2010:

makes me very concerned. Your article talkpage argument that this somehow justifies your hope to include more climate skeptics in science articles is all the more concerning because of this.

1980:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

1255:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

709:

i.e. uses a different format/name with the backslash instead of space. In fact the 3rd nomination was accidentally filed as the 2nd at first so I'm guessing the above was correct at the time

530:

Until your article is on the right lines, the link is irrelevant to the CRU article and you should revert it. The phrase may be UK specific, but doesn't relate to scientific peer review. . .

347: 1200: 1425:

Hi Ed. I'm somewhat disappointed by several of your recent edits on climate change articles - they seem pointy, and sometimes pointless to me. You have been here long enough to know that

1816:

Fairly, but nowhere near with equal weight. An important distinction. When we talk about sex differences on Knowledge, we are talking about science, not religion nor the supernatural.

4336:

That's too much boilerplate text for me to wade through. I took a screenshot, and I don't think Microsoft will challenge "fair use". If that's not good enough, then delete the image. --

1212: 590: 4351: 2551: 2710: 3667: 2727: 2712: 1420: 1196: 2105:

4 years ago you made that mistake with an entire paragraph, and it's not clear from your above response that you now understand it was wrong. There are some good explanations at

2080:

scientist published results which contradict the mainstream, and enough other scientists felt that his evidence and arguments merited study, would it be okay to include these? --

2617: 1182: 1760:

So, it sounds like the answer we should be putting into WP article is, "We don't know." Unless you or I stumble upon some research indicating significant innate differences. --

1574:

cellphone while in charge of any vehicle is legal, then there is a problem with the law. He might as well be juggling hand grenades. The law says a maximum of one? Dumb law. --

867:? Well, I'm not afraid of "provoking" my fellow contributors. Those who know me, know that all I want is a well written and impartial article. Who could be bothered by that? -- 3636:

I probably should have done a lot more with the article elsewhere before submitting it, like forming the quotes into a proper article (which you did for me). When I start the

2742: 4330: 909:

Hi Ed. Cirt and I has just started a discussion on the talk page about removing some of the extra examples and trivia from the page. Please join in if you care to. Thanks.

3271: 2908: 2924: 2913: 2983: 2903: 1442: 637: 389: 3254: 3223: 3935: 620:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 3323:

I can. He made a mistake and put that nonsense in the article instead of the talk page, where it would also have been inappropriate but wasn't revertable on sight.

1506: 4366: 4198:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 3206: 3143:

I did read the lede, and I felt that replacing it with the Scott Ambler quote - or incorporating the quote, would have improved the article. Clearly, you disagree.

1005:. Monckton is not a reliable source for anything other than his own opinion; and manifestly his personal opinion is of no interest in this case, other than to him 1429:, pure opinion without a single source, is not acceptable. The whole area has just been through the ArbCom wringer. One of the results has been the imposition of 452: 4023: 3916: 2757: 2452: 2386: 3617:

Sorry, I'm not a very good writer (and certainly not a hard worker). My talent is not so much in writing as in realizing that a topic needs to be written about.

2470: 3586:

says about boxed quotes applies, I think, to longer quotes: they can make a quote seem as if it represents some kind of officially sanctioned Knowledge stance.

2945: 2940: 2865: 2402: 2391: 202: 1917: 425: 3365: 2961: 2950: 2881: 2870: 2507:

I appreciate being asked for input, but I got zapped with a prohibition against editing or commenting on UC-related articles, due to some idea that I have a

2431: 1169: 228: 1448:

Thanks for cluing me in; I had not paid any attention to the Arbcom "wringer". I will avoid making any further climate-related edits until I've studied the

1070:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created

1003: 4029:

Before I answer, I'll need assurances that no sysop will block my account on grounds of breaking COI. Last time I was invited to post on a talk page, even

3962: 3283: 1509:. Specially, I was not impressed with the way you chose to wait till the end of the Arbitration case to begin making edits you know to be controversial. 846: 2734:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 1966:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 1653:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 1241:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 240: 4489: 3458: 2283:

the document were a work of the US government and you wanted to copy part of it literally into the article, you would have had to use a template such as

1058: 326:

No prob. And I apologize if my edit summary seemed a bit more rude than it should've been. Reviewing it just now, I think I should've phrased it better.

4046: 3249: 2599: 1014: 222: 1264: 1044: 2489: 1119: 1036: 894: 876: 3967: 3711: 3702: 3599:

better, especially with this particular article after this particular incident. It's hard work cleaning up after you -- please don't make it harder.

2348: 2288: 2221: 2110: 1996: 1913: 1906: 1629: 1188: 1187:

Hi Ed Poor, I got your name from the Editorial Team participant list, and wanted to tell you that we will be testing out assessment metrics in the

973: 3985: 3969: 3762: 3513: 2139: 175: 3739: 2089: 262: 4507:

Gosh, I'm awful sorry about that. I really should know better. May I address you as Stephan then or as Dr. Schulz? No disrespect intended! :-) --

2928: 1755:

However, this doesn't seem scientific to me. We only attribute causation to genetic or "other" causes after ruling out the factors we've studied.

4554: 4531: 4516: 3562: 2206: 2188: 1684: 1554: 1461: 700: 678: 669: 4393:

Arbcom request for amendment by me. Please comment there, because you are involved. It is a rather small request, but it is easy to defend it.

4001: 3489: 2537: 1942: 1661: 217: 124: 2446: 1621: 1593: 4474: 3547: 1739: 1539:

a point of view (which I think NPOV encourages), clearly my edits are not impressing anyone as being unbiased or in compliance with WP goals.

828: 652: 3503: 2702: 2680: 2406: 2354: 2333: 2294: 2261: 2227: 2116: 1149: 561: 538: 525: 4345: 4018: 3649: 3358: 2965: 2885: 2630: 2457:

An editor has claimed that you are among communists "freely roaming in wikipedia to disseminate their studies unchecked". You may comment

2197:

To be precise, I agree to trust it to be whatever you've already found it to be. It's not facts we've ever disagree on, you realize. ;-) --

1890: 1825: 1711: 1689: 1217: 943: 801: 774: 718: 366: 352: 139: 3777: 3608: 2836: 2525: 937: 440: 315: 4426: 4402: 4381: 4210: 4170: 4060: 1974: 1811: 1788: 1769: 1414: 4234:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 2646: 2062:

But I don't want to include more climate skeptics in science articles. I'm only asking how much climate skepticism we need, in light of

1881:

It's not official policy at Knowledge to assert that the supernatural is non-existent or otherwise incapable of being studied, is it? --

4287: 3870: 3472:

think he's important, or just because you wanted me to develop the article by myself more fully before placing into the main namespace?

1208: 3332: 3158: 3055: 3035: 1937: 277:. After all "Independent review" is actually just a synonym for peer review and I don't see how we could maintain a separate article. 97: 4307: 3990: 3536: 2638:

Several times in the past year, I have been invited to comment on UC-related topics, despite the ban. In each case I have declined.

1249: 918: 885:

Ah, you like me feel a right to assume that wiki will be essentially sane at all times. And look what happened to the both of us :-)

585: 3080: 2762: 2589: 2160:

Good catches all around, and I've really learned something today that will help me be a better WP contributor. Thanks, guys! :-) --

1329: 456: 397: 3955: 2021: 1103: 1083: 3182: 1293: 2237: 2109:, and many universities also have helpful documents on the topic, precisely because their students find it so counterintuitive. 2017: 475: 170: 3446: 3366: 2860: 1904: 1099: 1079: 4501: 4051:

Please comment there. I think and hope that you are paranoid and I will defend you if you are attacked for this small matter.

3816: 3192:

Hi Ed, I have thought about your request, I just don't know how much time or energy I would have to give to such a project.

2629:). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the 3420:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this:

2821: 2649:

if everyone wanted me back. I was surprised to receive, rather than a "No, thanks", an immediate escalation to "Block him!".

2324:

So the next time I will use quotation marks, or a quotation template, or something like that. Are we on the same page now? --

1399: 1288: 1284: 1204: 2689:

You're right. I should simply have reminded Kittfoxxe I was topic banned, instead of responding to his invitation by asking

996: 286: 4449: 4201:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

3137: 1928:

tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention.

1578: 1360: 407: 398: 339: 4315: 2810:

This will be a museum touring and partying meetup, so no excuses about being a shy newbie this time. Bring a friend too!

2606: 2038: 1107: 902: 857: 4091:

psychologically. It's good to keep these around for those interested in the history of how new religions are persecuted.

3294: 753: 705:

As an aside for those who are reading this discussion and confused, the reason the 2nd nomination is a red link is it's

3911: 3694: 3256: 3208: 3170: 2976: 2946: 2909: 2896: 2866: 2485: 2427: 2387: 2381: 1067:

the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

4283: 3939:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2665: 2279:

or at least put in your own words. Readers cannot be expected to guess that you copied literally if you don't say so.

1524: 420: 3068: 2994: 949: 4407:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FEd_Poor_2

3851: 3317: 2275:

that passage would think that you have written it on your own and the reference is for a document part of which you

1382: 4014: 3831: 3164: 2814: 2153:

And Stephen, you are right about my assumption that the Wegman report was in the public domain. I did not check. I

1392: 1173: 571: 3007: 2642: 1426: 1341: 1177: 3838:-- it would save a lot of deletion proceedings (which your user talk is always chock full of notifications for). 2731: 1963: 1750:) and that (B) since environment is the only other cause worthy of consideration, that must be the place to look. 1650: 1478: 1238: 591: 144: 3827: 3096: 2169: 1388:

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

1129:. If you'll look at the Knowledge page for this image, in the lower right hand corner, you'll see this message; 2501: 1010: 890: 853: 3944: 3351: 3344: 4291: 4277: 4074: 3903: 3857:

Aside from outdated templates, there are 10 AfD notices on my talk page. All but three are for articles that

3801: 3090: 2970: 2890: 2585: 1323: 3386: 2842: 1354: 616:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 446: 89: 4372:

Thank you. I think I have learned in the couple of years to go with the flow and follow the consensus. --

4010: 3845: 3201: 2025: 1676: 1486: 1260: 903: 81: 76: 64: 59: 1565: 418:

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session.

4311: 4271: 3768:

Yes, thanks for the answer, and I hope we can think of a way to make this more clear in the article. --

3308: 3128: 2807:" project, with specially-created Knowledge articles on the artists displayed on iPads in the gallery. 2103: 2034: 1502: 1091: 1062:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 268: 236: 38: 4299: 3746: 2312: 1071: 3994: 3540: 2735: 2574: 2466: 1967: 1747: 1654: 1242: 1006: 978: 886: 849: 613: 370: 198: 120: 4527: 4497: 3393: 2584:

acknowledging you are under a topic ban from Unification Church related articles and talk pages at

2184: 2135: 1517: 1482: 1438: 969: 863:

Oh, is that why Dave met me here, instead of there, when he wanted to discuss reverting my link to

373:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 201:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 123:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 2804: 2800: 1275: 4417:

Please answer Bishonen question to you. When were you invited to comment on UC related subjects?

3813: 3806: 1991: 1680: 609: 595: 1381:, and hold salon-style group discussions on Knowledge and the other Wikimedia projects (see the 4488:

I'm fine with Stephan, but I'm not "Mr. Schulz"....assuming you were addressing me, of course.

4480: 4434: 3885: 3876: 3690: 3312: 3288: 3132: 2595: 2488:

since the information in the first is mostly aready in the second. Please discuss if you like:

2424: 2284: 1618: 1575: 1494: 1256: 321: 301:

There's also the issue of the (claimed) breakdown of the system of pre-publication peer review.

194: 180: 4445: 4242: 3821: 3704: 2569: 2556: 2364: 2030: 1560: 730: 632: 581: 335: 293: 232: 3485: 3454: 3432: 3414: 3104: 2988: 2784: 2763: 2462: 2351: 2291: 2224: 2113: 2106: 1715: 1703: 1317: 1309: 1278: 1269: 1165: 1115: 1087: 535: 472: 135: 2793: 2175:

No worries (well, no new worries ;-). Just to clarify: We do agree now that the report is

761:

I forget whether that was a typo, or a "copy and paste" problem. If the latter, do we add

8: 4550: 4523: 4512: 4493: 4470: 4377: 4341: 4166: 4042: 3866: 3773: 3682: 3645: 3604: 3583: 3575: 3499: 3154: 3031: 2936: 2856: 2698: 2661: 2521: 2442: 2329: 2257: 2202: 2180: 2165: 2131: 2085: 1923: 1886: 1821: 1807: 1765: 1589: 1550: 1510: 1498: 1457: 1434: 1145: 1032: 992: 965: 933: 872: 824: 797: 770: 749: 714: 696: 675: 666: 648: 624: 557: 521: 412: 311: 258: 245: 166: 4304:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

2044:

Yes, I'm sorry that I forget I was the one who copied that public domain quote from the

292:

At some point the articles could be merged, but we need some way to distinguish between

4206: 3797: 3758: 2832: 2770: 2497: 2377: 1981: 1719: 1410: 961: 914: 864: 509: 497: 482: 460: 436: 385: 282: 3410: 2997:(bulleted sentence) makes the lead kindof disjointed. What were you going for there? – 4422: 4398: 4362: 4235: 4056: 3895: 3735: 3686: 3657: 3592: 3328: 3279: 3178: 2417: 2412: 1784: 1735: 1723: 1376: 47: 17: 2215:

Sorry for the late response. From the POV of our licence incorporating text that is

924:

I'd love to, if all parties concerned agree that my participation won't result in a

4441: 3559: 2753: 2745:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

2098:

Please don't take this the wrong way, but you should make sure that you understand

1977:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

1933: 1664:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

1252:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

848:. But attempting new discussions on Cl Ch right now might be viewed as provocative 736:

Edward C. Banfield published a book in 1968 that made a simple and well-documented

577: 505: 331: 1133: 1126: 789: 153:

We need to change to a system where no edit is exposed to the public until enough

3959: 3790:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/As a Peace-Loving Global Citizen (2nd nomination)

3579: 3481: 3465: 3450: 3402: 3370: 3263: 3197: 3169:

Hello Ed! I would like to request that the redirect RIGHT point to the brand new

2964:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2927:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2884:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2789: 2677: 2603: 2532:

Arbitration Enforcement - Violation of topic ban from Unification Church articles

2458: 2405:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2001: 1854: 1707: 1672: 1161: 1111: 1076:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

957: 531: 468: 306:

Anyway, I won't oppose a merge vigorously, as long as there's a good redirect. --

213: 131: 3834:. If you aren't competent to create an article, at least to a minimal standard, 3406: 3405:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

1857: 1566:"This New York driver is holding two cellphones at once, violating a state law." 1106:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 1002:

Ed, please don't jump into highly controversial articles and do stuff like this

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4461: 4456: 4320: 4290:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

3879:'s was closed with a delete; currently there's a redirect, hence the blue link. 3637: 3600: 3304: 3124: 3112: 3078: 3053: 3005: 2932: 2852: 2547: 2157:

that since it was a product of the US government, but I failed to check this.

2067: 2063: 1817: 1646: 1631: 1490: 1467: 1433:. Please be careful and discuss edits that are possibly contentious on talk. -- 1368: 1155: 988: 820: 793: 745: 710: 296:

and other ways the members of the scientific community check each other's work.

116: 102: 3118:

You've been around much longer than me, so please forgive this telling off. --

2848: 2813:

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at

1391:

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at

1192: 3793: 3754: 3714:

here, because it's about the article topic, not about improving the article:

3531: 3515: 3215: 3108: 2828: 2626: 2508: 2493: 2475: 2373: 2365: 2045: 1406: 1024: 925: 910: 432: 381: 348: 278: 176: 98: 481:

I'm glad you brought that up, because I wasn't sure it was the same kind of

375:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate)

4546: 4542: 4508: 4466: 4418: 4394: 4373: 4358: 4337: 4162: 4119: 4052: 4038: 3940: 3891: 3862: 3769: 3731: 3641: 3495: 3324: 3275: 3174: 3150: 3100: 3027: 2694: 2673: 2657: 2622: 2517: 2438: 2325: 2253: 2198: 2161: 2081: 1882: 1803: 1780: 1761: 1731: 1727: 1585: 1546: 1453: 1141: 1028: 929: 868: 766: 692: 644: 553: 517: 307: 254: 162: 4220:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

3494:

Okay, but how about now, after I've made 3 additional edits to the bio? --

1850:

as to whether science necessarily excludes religion and the supernatural.

1191:, and I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the 3783: 3556: 3385:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

3228: 2749: 2481: 2053:

At least I remembered to credit the source then, because (as you hinted)

1959: 1944: 1929: 840: 618:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mel Gibson DUI incident (2nd nomination)

513: 501: 464: 274: 4118:

But I worry also that this new rule they made up a few years ago about "

1473: 987:

on this subject and use the talk page to express your concerns. Thanks.

707:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mel Gibson DUI incident/(2nd nomination)

663:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mel Gibson DUI incident (3nd nomination)

3841: 3193: 3187: 2720: 2054: 1668: 953: 209: 3753:

is never pronounced. Your example begins , not (can you read that?).

1096:

the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

3299: 3119: 3071: 3046: 2998: 2542: 1302: 1234: 1219: 1063: 691:

Yeah, sometimes I don't wait for the answer but just go a-huntin'. --

1049: 2398: 2007: 1952: 1639: 1227: 623:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

602: 380:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

359: 208:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

187: 130:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

109: 4459:

article as a general topic, separate from the article on the book

4181:

File permission problem with File:Visual Studio properties box.png

3666: 1318:

Saturday October 16th, Jefferson Market Library in Lower Manhattan

273:

Welcome. I think though the topic should better be dealt with at

1507:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Climate change#Final decision

2562: 1132:

homicide in Washington, D.C., 1960-2005 based on statistics at

4492:

applies, although I'm a bit less testy. No hard feelings... --

2743:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Geneva Conventions controversy

2048:. My "astonishment" should have been about my own poor memory. 1199:. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the 3262:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

3214:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2130:

into the public domain, the copyright is with the authors. --

1493:

if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the

3595:, but I don't understand why you don't try to do at least a 3415:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

3361:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2849:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Ed_Poor/Flat_earth_problem

2598:. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the 2490:

Talk:List of Unification Church members#Merge in True Family

4248:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

3875:

Hmm, a blue link does not indicate AfD outcome of "keep" -

2730:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be 1962:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be 1649:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be 1584:

I took that photo in my own car, with my friend driving. --

1237:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be 674:

Oh, never mind, looking at that page you clearly found it.

4352:

will do a good word for you regarding editing restrictions

3718:

I can't read IPA. Is the 't' pronounced in the following?

3338: 2820:

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our

1398:

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our

4537: 2966:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2929:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2886:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2407:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

1730:

is related to this issue. And there are probably more. --

762: 3640:

article, I will try to keep your suggestions in mind. --

3436:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for

2602:

and follow the instructions there to appeal your block.

1421:

ArbCom Discretionary sanction on Climate Change articles

3983:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3529:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3173:. Get it?!? I would very much appreciate it. Thanks! 1183:

the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You!

4294:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

3954:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

2641:

This time, as a full year had gone by, I responded to

1353:

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to

1125:

I created the file myself, based on statistic I found

411:

has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at

203:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Democratically elected

2236:

Thanks for clarifying that, Hans. This means that my

491:

choose to remove the link without further discussion.

3989:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

3535:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

740:

that the problems played out in ghetto neighborhoods

4314:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 3413:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please 2799:

A particular highlight for the wiki crowd will be '

2693:

for a ban removal. I apologize for my violation. --

365:An article that you have been involved in editing, 193:An article that you have been involved in editing, 115:An article that you have been involved in editing, 3357:Message added 23:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC). You can 2801:Seductive Subversion: Women Pop Artists, 1958–1968 2538:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Ed_Poor 1489:on any editor working on pages broadly related to 253:Sorry, while I was away someone deleted it. :-( -- 4033:whether I would not be breaking COI was deemed a 2726:A discussion has begun about whether the article 2600:guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks 2594:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 1958:A discussion has begun about whether the article 1645:A discussion has begun about whether the article 1233:A discussion has begun about whether the article 467:? If not, can you undo your linking edit? . . . 4270:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 3917:Orphaned non-free image File:Global-citizen.png 2453:Accusations of pro-Communist bias in your edits 1134:http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/dccrime.htm 4148:of violating NPOV. Now I'm under various bans. 4002:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Cult checklist 3950:Note that any non-free images not used in any 3407:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 1662:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Heteroflexible 3548:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Unit cohesion 3426:which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( 1195:. There is more info about assessment on the 125:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Booky's Crush 2307:Oh, my! You're saying that the Edit summary 2252:make it clear that I copied it literally. -- 1712:Sex-related differences in spatial cognition 1365:, plan for the next stages of projects like 367:Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate) 353:Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate) 3270:redirect, you might want to participate in 3222:redirect, you might want to participate in 1975:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Edge motion 1027:, so I'm going to disregard your advice. -- 3350:Hello, Ed Poor. You have new messages at 3266:. Since you had some involvement with the 3218:. Since you had some involvement with the 1045:File source problem with File:Dc crime.png 227:You are invited to join the discussion at 4545:, and how important it was to my boss! -- 3664: 3582:, for that matter. To some extent, what 2588:, and yet flagrantly violating it a mere 2179:a product of the US government, right? -- 1250:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nukespeak 4209:or another acceptable free license (see 2769: 1189:Wikiproject: United States Public Policy 765:to the wrongly spelled word, or what? -- 457:Climatic Research Unit email controversy 223:Since you've participated in this before 4310:. You may wish to read the Knowledge's 4215:at the site of the original publication 4205:make a note permitting reuse under the 3890:Where did the personal attacks occur? – 3387:the guide to writing your first article 2827:This has been an automated delivery by 1405:This has been an automated delivery by 431:This has been an automated delivery by 14: 4284:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use 576:LOL. Thanks. That's very nice of you. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4195:File:Visual Studio properties box.png 2788:is this weekend on Saturday Dec 4 at 2238:use of a quote from the Wegman report 4536:Funny you should put it that way (a 3274:(if you have not already done so). 3226:(if you have not already done so). 1690:Mental and emotional sex differences 1485:to impose, at their own discretion, 944:Shape of the Earth Merger Discussion 500:article I've started is a "fork" of 25: 4282:or one of the other tags listed at 3991:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3537:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3449:the page or email a copy to you. 3392:You may want to consider using the 612:, an article that you created, for 23: 4184: 3922: 3445:to request that the administrator 3375: 3343: 3171:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism 2561: 2486:List of Unification Church members 2066:, so that the mainstream views on 1846:I think there's still some debate 1048: 952:of the merger proposals involving 24: 4570: 4000:The article will be discussed at 3546:The article will be discussed at 2741:The article will be discussed at 1973:The article will be discussed at 1660:The article will be discussed at 1248:The article will be discussed at 948:Your comments are welcome at the 330:Anyway, have a great summer. :-) 4258: 4225: 3976: 3830:, I would suggest that you read 3665: 3522: 3421: 2956: 2919: 2876: 2815:Knowledge:Meetup/NYC/Invite list 2719: 2397: 1951: 1638: 1472: 1393:Knowledge:Meetup/NYC/Invite list 1301: 1226: 1205:ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) 601: 421:Register for the Wiki-Conference 358: 186: 108: 29: 2437:Okay to delete, Thanks, Ham. -- 1294:Knowledge NYC Meetup Sat Oct 16 4316:Media copyright questions page 4126:POV any "validity" but simply 4077:if you'd care to look into it. 4073:It's not paranoia; I refer to 2728:Geneva Conventions controversy 2713:Geneva Conventions controversy 1789:18:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 1770:18:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 1740:14:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 1617:She was as mad as a hatter. -- 1357:activities, review the recent 1289:05:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1265:01:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC) 1213:21:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 1178:06:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 1150:00:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 1108:Media copyright questions page 845:You may or may not have noted 13: 1: 4292:Knowledge:File copyright tags 4238:. If you take this step, add 3945:our policy for non-free media 3745:As the article says (section 3726:Does it begin AY EELAH or AY 3433:the page's talk page directly 3202:02:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC) 3183:01:31, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 2861:16:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 2758:00:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC) 2703:21:32, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 2681:21:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 2666:21:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 2607:21:11, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 2578:from editing for a period of 2552:20:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 2526:20:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 2502:09:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1120:10:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 1037:03:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 974:21:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 426:here for on-wiki notification 4308:criteria for speedy deletion 4130:this would not be a problem. 3956:criteria for speedy deletion 3861:the deletion proceedings. -- 3411:criteria for speedy deletion 3396:to help you create articles. 3293:What were you thinking with 3159:21:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 3138:02:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 3081:13:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 3056:19:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 3036:19:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 3008:18:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 2984:01:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 2941:18:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 2904:06:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 2837:22:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2480:I've just suggested merging 2471:00:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 2447:22:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2432:01:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2382:19:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 2355:17:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 2334:17:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 2295:16:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 2262:16:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 2228:15:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 2207:18:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 2189:16:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 2170:15:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 2140:22:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 2117:22:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 2090:22:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 2039:18:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 1997:03:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1938:13:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 1920:and feel free to remove the 1891:18:15, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 1826:23:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC) 1685:01:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 1622:23:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1594:22:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1579:22:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1555:21:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1525:17:21, 15 October 2010 (UTC) 1462:21:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1443:17:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC) 1369:Knowledge Ambassador Program 1355:meta:Wikimedia New York City 1203:or just contact me. Thanks! 1080:criteria for speedy deletion 7: 4011:The Resident Anthropologist 3443:one of these administrators 2796:program, starting at 5 PM. 2057:can rely hurt this project. 1812:18:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 1570:Seriously, if holding even 1415:16:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC) 1015:20:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 997:20:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 938:16:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 919:23:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC) 904:Moonie (Unification Church) 895:14:04, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 877:16:53, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 858:16:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 829:00:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC) 802:00:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC) 775:21:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 754:11:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 719:14:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 586:17:15, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 562:15:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 539:15:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 526:14:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 476:14:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 10: 4575: 4272:Knowledge:Non-free content 3695:20:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 3650:16:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 3609:05:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 3563:00:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC) 3504:16:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC) 3490:16:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC) 3459:16:42, 16 April 2011 (UTC) 3333:21:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 3318:21:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 3284:15:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 3255:Americans (USA) listed at 701:19:34, 1 August 2010 (UTC) 679:19:29, 1 August 2010 (UTC) 670:19:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC) 653:18:43, 1 August 2010 (UTC) 643:Huh? That's a red link. -- 441:15:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 150:Which is not good enough. 4259: 4226: 3923: 3832:WP:Competence is required 3671: 3401:A tag has been placed on 3250:00:08, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 2925:Template:Stricken passage 2914:Template:Stricken passage 2803:', and the accompanying " 2613:Notice to administrators: 2596:make useful contributions 1748:Methodological naturalism 1694:I recently read the book 1140:So what's the problem? -- 638:23:48, 31 July 2010 (UTC) 390:12:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC) 340:21:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC) 316:12:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC) 287:12:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC) 263:23:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC) 218:21:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC) 4555:15:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 4532:15:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 4517:15:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 4502:12:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 4475:23:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 4450:23:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 4427:11:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC) 4403:18:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 4382:16:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 4367:13:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 4346:23:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 4331:00:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 4171:23:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 4061:20:29, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 4047:18:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 4024:19:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 3993:or whether it should be 3963:04:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 3912:17:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC) 3871:12:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 3817:04:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 3539:or whether it should be 3257:Redirects for discussion 3209:Redirects for discussion 3207:Knowledge:POV listed at 3165:WikiProject Conservatism 2572:decision, you have been 2240:- which I summarized as 1912:A template you created, 1503:normal editorial process 1361:Wiki-Conference NYC 2010 1193:Public Policy Initiative 1056:Thank you for uploading 1023:Doc, I think you have a 983:Feel free to peruse the 572:Robert L. Park copyedits 241:19:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 171:15:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC) 140:22:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC) 3936:File:Global-citizen.png 3852:12:30, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 3828:this malformed creation 3802:14:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 3778:16:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 3763:15:19, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 3740:18:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 3272:the redirect discussion 3224:the redirect discussion 2947:Nomination for deletion 2910:Nomination for deletion 2867:Nomination for deletion 2766:: Saturday, December 4 2691:on the banned talk page 2388:Nomination for deletion 1704:Biology of gender#Brain 1450:Discretionary_sanctions 1431:Discretionary_sanctions 610:Mel Gibson DUI incident 596:Mel Gibson DUI incident 145:Details and big picture 4189: 3928: 3877:Democratically elected 3398: 3380: 3352:Talk:Emissions trading 3348: 2779: 2566: 2285:Template:US government 2248:plagiarism, because I 1053: 512:should be merged into 459:article which goes to 369:, has been listed for 197:, has been listed for 195:Democratically elected 181:Democratically elected 119:, has been listed for 4455:Oh, is there still a 4192:Thanks for uploading 4188: 3933:Thanks for uploading 3926: 3705:Talk:Liaison (French) 3383: 3379: 3347: 3091:Please take more care 2792:during their awesome 2773: 2565: 2076:For example, if even 1499:standards of behavior 1479:Arbitration Committee 1383:May meeting's minutes 1052: 592:Articles for deletion 294:anonymous peer review 42:of past discussions. 4278:non-free fair use in 4274:, use a tag such as 4035:deliberate violation 3703:Question moved from 3683:recent contributions 3105:Database refactoring 2851:, I added a comment. 2843:Ed Poor - Flat Earth 2785:Knowledge NYC Meetup 2403:Template:Starrquacks 2392:Template:Starrquacks 2287:or equivalent text. 2242:from public domain ) 1716:sex and intelligence 1495:purpose of Knowledge 1310:New York City Meetup 1025:conflict of interest 1007:William M. Connolley 887:William M. Connolley 850:William M. Connolley 496:I don't see how the 3675:The Modest Barnstar 3109:Assuming Good Faith 3070:Tweak as desired. – 2962:Template:Courtstick 2951:Template:Courtstick 2882:Template:Cry vandal 2871:Template:Cry vandal 2309:from public domain 1708:Gender role#Biology 1696:Delusions of Gender 428:. All are invited! 424:here. And sign up 413:New York University 408:Wiki-Conference NYC 399:Wiki-Conference NYC 229:Talk:Korean Cuisine 4306:, as described on 4190: 3929: 3747:Impossible liaison 3381: 3359:remove this notice 3349: 2780: 2567: 2315:were insufficient. 1720:Genetics of gender 1197:9/13/2010 Signpost 1086:. If the image is 1072:in your upload log 1054: 962:Shape of the Earth 865:Independent review 744:Do you mean case? 510:Independent review 498:Independent review 483:independent review 461:Independent review 447:Independent review 269:Independent review 4541:work to look for 4440:doing the split. 4022: 3941:claim of fair use 3700: 3699: 2980: 2900: 2839: 2634: 2430: 1989: 1724:Sexual dimorphism 1417: 1377:Knowledge Academy 1351: 1350: 1257:Everard Proudfoot 1059:File:Dc crime.png 979:Re: Server breach 608:I have nominated 443: 249: 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Ed Poor 4566: 4327: 4325: 4312:image use policy 4281: 4265: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4247: 4241: 4232: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4187: 4013: 3980: 3979: 3931: 3925: 3908: 3900: 3850: 3826:With respect to 3681:Thanks for your 3669: 3662: 3661: 3526: 3525: 3429: 3425: 3424: 3378: 3362: 3316: 3248: 3246: 3243: 3240: 3237: 3234: 3231: 3136: 3095:I saw you added 3076: 3051: 3003: 2982: 2978: 2973: 2960: 2959: 2923: 2922: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2880: 2879: 2826: 2774:We meet outside 2723: 2620: 2611: 2423: 2420: 2401: 2031:ScienceApologist 2013:Relevant diffs: 1994: 1987: 1986: 1955: 1927: 1848:among scientists 1706:. Also there is 1642: 1520: 1476: 1404: 1346: 1344: 1340: 1334: 1305: 1298: 1297: 1230: 1078:per Knowledge's 635: 629: 605: 506:talk:peer review 430: 362: 243: 233:Melonbarmonster2 190: 112: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4574: 4573: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4483: 4437: 4354: 4323: 4321: 4300:your upload log 4280:|article name}} 4275: 4257: 4255: 4245: 4239: 4224: 4222: 4185: 4183: 3981: 3977: 3974: 3920: 3919: 3907: 3904: 3899: 3896: 3888: 3848: 3839: 3824: 3809: 3807:marginalization 3786: 3743: 3708: 3660: 3527: 3523: 3520: 3466:J.C.C. McKinsey 3464:Did you speedy 3427: 3422: 3403:J.C.C. McKinsey 3399: 3376: 3374: 3371:J.C.C. McKinsey 3367:Speedy deletion 3363: 3356: 3341: 3302: 3291: 3268:Americans (USA) 3264:Americans (USA) 3260: 3244: 3241: 3238: 3235: 3232: 3229: 3227: 3212: 3190: 3167: 3122: 3093: 3072: 3047: 2999: 2991: 2975: 2969: 2968:. Thank you. — 2957: 2954: 2920: 2917: 2895: 2889: 2888:. Thank you. — 2877: 2874: 2845: 2794:First Saturdays 2790:Brooklyn Museum 2768: 2736:deletion policy 2724: 2717: 2636: 2616: 2590:3 minutes later 2559: 2534: 2478: 2455: 2418: 2395: 2369: 2004: 1992: 1982: 1968:deletion policy 1956: 1949: 1921: 1914:Template:Newbie 1910: 1907:Template:Newbie 1905:Deprecation of 1855:Stephen Hawking 1692: 1655:deletion policy 1643: 1636: 1563: 1518: 1497:, any expected 1470: 1423: 1342: 1338: 1332: 1327: 1296: 1287: 1279:NativeForeigner 1272: 1243:deletion policy 1231: 1224: 1185: 1158: 1100:speedy deletion 1047: 981: 958:Spherical Earth 946: 907: 843: 733: 633: 625: 606: 599: 574: 451:Hi, Ed, you've 449: 405:Our 2nd annual 403: 363: 356: 324: 271: 225: 191: 184: 147: 113: 106: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4572: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4524:Stephan Schulz 4494:Stephan Schulz 4482: 4481:Politeness.... 4479: 4478: 4477: 4462:Voodoo Science 4457:Voodoo science 4436: 4435:Voodoo science 4433: 4432: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4387: 4385: 4384: 4353: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4256:permissions-en 4250: 4249: 4223:permissions-en 4218: 4182: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 3986:Cult checklist 3975: 3973: 3970:Cult checklist 3968:Nomination of 3966: 3918: 3915: 3905: 3897: 3887: 3886:Fair enough... 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3844: 3836:then don't try 3823: 3820: 3808: 3805: 3785: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3749:), the ‹t› of 3724: 3723: 3722:Et il a reposé 3716: 3707: 3701: 3698: 3697: 3678: 3677: 3672: 3670: 3659: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3638:Gender norming 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3612: 3611: 3588: 3587: 3571: 3570: 3521: 3519: 3514:Nomination of 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3474: 3473: 3394:Article Wizard 3382: 3373: 3369:nomination of 3364: 3355: 3342: 3340: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3290: 3289:What on Earth? 3287: 3259: 3253: 3211: 3205: 3189: 3186: 3166: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3145: 3144: 3092: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3039: 3038: 3022: 3021: 3016: 3015: 2990: 2987: 2953: 2944: 2916: 2907: 2873: 2864: 2844: 2841: 2825: 2767: 2761: 2718: 2716: 2711:Nomination of 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2684: 2683: 2609: 2568:To enforce an 2560: 2558: 2555: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2513: 2512: 2477: 2474: 2454: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2394: 2385: 2368: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2231: 2230: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2192: 2191: 2181:Stephan Schulz 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2132:Stephan Schulz 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2093: 2092: 2073: 2072: 2068:global warming 2059: 2058: 2050: 2049: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2003: 2000: 1950: 1948: 1943:Nomination of 1941: 1909: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1773: 1772: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1691: 1688: 1669:Justin (koavf) 1647:Heteroflexible 1637: 1635: 1632:Heteroflexible 1630:Nomination of 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1541: 1540: 1491:Climate change 1483:administrators 1481:has permitted 1469: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1435:Stephan Schulz 1422: 1419: 1403: 1349: 1348: 1326: 1321: 1314: 1306: 1295: 1292: 1283: 1271: 1268: 1225: 1223: 1218:Nomination of 1216: 1184: 1181: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1018: 1017: 980: 977: 966:SteveMcCluskey 945: 942: 941: 940: 906: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 880: 879: 842: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 780: 779: 778: 777: 742: 741: 732: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 684: 683: 682: 681: 676:Dreaded Walrus 672: 667:Dreaded Walrus 656: 655: 627:Whisky drinker 600: 598: 594:nomination of 589: 573: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 544: 543: 542: 541: 493: 492: 487: 486: 448: 445: 429: 402: 396: 394: 357: 355: 351:nomination of 346: 344: 323: 322:The Karate Kid 320: 319: 318: 303: 302: 298: 297: 270: 267: 266: 265: 224: 221: 185: 183: 179:nomination of 174: 146: 143: 107: 105: 101:nomination of 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4571: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4539: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4529: 4525: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4514: 4510: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4486: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4463: 4458: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4447: 4443: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4408: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4364: 4360: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4329: 4328: 4318:. Thank you. 4317: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4295: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4279: 4273: 4268: 4266: 4264:wikimedia.org 4244: 4237: 4233: 4231:wikimedia.org 4219: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4199: 4197: 4196: 4172: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4147: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4129: 4128:describing it 4125: 4121: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4076: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4006: 4003: 3998: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3987: 3971: 3965: 3964: 3961: 3958:. Thank you. 3957: 3953: 3948: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3937: 3930: 3914: 3913: 3909: 3901: 3893: 3878: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3849: 3847: 3843: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3822:WP:COMPETENCE 3819: 3818: 3815: 3814:Peter morrell 3804: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3742: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3715: 3713: 3712:your question 3706: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3679: 3676: 3673: 3668: 3663: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3572: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3561: 3558: 3552: 3549: 3544: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3533: 3532:Unit cohesion 3517: 3516:Unit cohesion 3505: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3439: 3435: 3434: 3418: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3397: 3395: 3390: 3388: 3372: 3368: 3360: 3353: 3346: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3301: 3296: 3286: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3258: 3252: 3251: 3247: 3225: 3221: 3220:Knowledge:POV 3217: 3216:Knowledge:POV 3210: 3204: 3203: 3199: 3195: 3185: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3121: 3116: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3082: 3079: 3077: 3075: 3069: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3057: 3054: 3052: 3050: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3024: 3023: 3018: 3017: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3006: 3004: 3002: 2996: 2986: 2985: 2981: 2972: 2967: 2963: 2952: 2948: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2931:. Thank you. 2930: 2926: 2915: 2911: 2906: 2905: 2901: 2892: 2887: 2883: 2872: 2868: 2863: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2840: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2823: 2818: 2816: 2811: 2808: 2806: 2802: 2797: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2777: 2772: 2765: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2746: 2744: 2739: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2722: 2714: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2675: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2656:Thank you. -- 2654: 2650: 2648: 2644: 2639: 2635: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2619: 2618:2010 decision 2614: 2608: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2591: 2587: 2581: 2577: 2576: 2571: 2564: 2557:November 2010 2554: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2539: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2473: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2429: 2426: 2422: 2421: 2416: 2415: 2409:. Thank you. 2408: 2404: 2400: 2393: 2389: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2367: 2366:Alfred Kinsey 2356: 2353: 2350: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2296: 2293: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2158: 2156: 2151: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2118: 2115: 2112: 2108: 2107:WP:Plagiarism 2104: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2046:Wegman report 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2026: 2024: 2022: 2020: 2018: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2011: 2009: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1978: 1976: 1971: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1954: 1946: 1940: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1925: 1919: 1915: 1908: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1858: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1746:studied (see 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1697: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1665: 1663: 1658: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1641: 1633: 1623: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1577: 1573: 1568: 1567: 1561:Love this one 1556: 1552: 1548: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1514: 1513: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1475: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1418: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1401: 1396: 1394: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1356: 1347: 1345: 1337: 1331: 1325: 1320: 1319: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1253: 1251: 1246: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1229: 1221: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1110:. Thank you. 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1051: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 994: 990: 986: 976: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 939: 935: 931: 928:complaint. -- 927: 923: 922: 921: 920: 916: 912: 905: 896: 892: 888: 884: 883: 882: 881: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 861: 860: 859: 855: 851: 847: 830: 826: 822: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 803: 799: 795: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 751: 747: 739: 735: 734: 731:Cast or case? 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 703: 702: 698: 694: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 680: 677: 673: 671: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 657: 654: 650: 646: 642: 641: 640: 639: 636: 630: 628: 621: 619: 615: 611: 604: 597: 593: 588: 587: 583: 579: 563: 559: 555: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 540: 537: 533: 529: 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 494: 489: 488: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 444: 442: 438: 434: 427: 423: 422: 416: 414: 410: 409: 400: 395: 392: 391: 387: 383: 378: 377:. Thank you. 376: 372: 368: 361: 354: 350: 345: 342: 341: 337: 333: 327: 317: 313: 309: 305: 304: 300: 299: 295: 291: 290: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 264: 260: 256: 252: 251: 250: 247: 242: 238: 234: 230: 220: 219: 215: 211: 206: 205:. Thank you. 204: 200: 196: 189: 182: 178: 173: 172: 168: 164: 159: 156: 151: 142: 141: 137: 133: 128: 127:. Thank you. 126: 122: 118: 117:Booky's Crush 111: 104: 103:Booky's Crush 100: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4487: 4484: 4460: 4438: 4386: 4355: 4319: 4303: 4296: 4286:, and add a 4269: 4254: 4251: 4243:OTRS pending 4221: 4214: 4200: 4193: 4191: 4145: 4127: 4123: 4120:undue weight 4034: 4031:asking there 4030: 4007: 3999: 3984: 3982: 3972:for deletion 3951: 3949: 3934: 3932: 3921: 3889: 3858: 3840: 3835: 3825: 3810: 3788:Please see: 3787: 3750: 3744: 3730:EELAH ? ? -- 3727: 3725: 3717: 3709: 3687:Mike Restivo 3674: 3596: 3584:WP:QUOTEFARM 3576:WP:LONGQUOTE 3560:(let's chat) 3553: 3545: 3530: 3528: 3518:for deletion 3469: 3468:because you 3437: 3431: 3419: 3400: 3391: 3384: 3292: 3267: 3261: 3219: 3213: 3191: 3168: 3117: 3101:Scott Ambler 3094: 3073: 3048: 3000: 2992: 2989:Edit to lead 2955: 2918: 2875: 2846: 2822:mailing list 2819: 2812: 2809: 2798: 2783: 2781: 2776:by the trees 2775: 2747: 2740: 2725: 2715:for deletion 2690: 2655: 2651: 2643:this request 2640: 2637: 2612: 2610: 2583: 2579: 2573: 2541: 2535: 2479: 2456: 2413: 2410: 2396: 2370: 2308: 2280: 2276: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2216: 2176: 2159: 2154: 2152: 2148: 2099: 2077: 2029: 2012: 2005: 1983: 1979: 1972: 1957: 1947:for deletion 1911: 1847: 1728:Testosterone 1701: 1695: 1693: 1666: 1659: 1644: 1634:for deletion 1571: 1569: 1564: 1536: 1532: 1515: 1511: 1471: 1424: 1400:mailing list 1397: 1390: 1387: 1375: 1374: 1367: 1366: 1359: 1358: 1352: 1316: 1313: 1308: 1277: 1273: 1270:Yay, not yet 1254: 1247: 1232: 1222:for deletion 1201:project page 1186: 1159: 1095: 1075: 1069: 1057: 1055: 982: 947: 908: 844: 743: 737: 626: 622: 607: 575: 453:added a link 450: 419: 417: 406: 404: 401:(2nd annual) 393: 379: 364: 343: 328: 325: 272: 226: 207: 192: 160: 154: 152: 148: 129: 114: 70: 43: 37: 4442:Vegaswikian 3710:I'm moving 3627:submission. 3099:quote from 2778:at 5:00 PM. 2631:proper page 2570:arbitration 2536:Please see 2482:True Family 2374:Simon Speed 1960:Edge motion 1945:Edge motion 1274:Not yet :P 1088:copyrighted 661:It's here: 578:Nightscream 514:Peer review 502:Peer review 465:peer review 332:Nightscream 275:Peer review 36:This is an 3960:Courcelles 3792:. Thanks. 3593:WP:PERFECT 3428:{{db-...}} 2971:This, that 2891:This, that 2764:NYC Meetup 2678:Courcelles 2645:by asking 2604:Courcelles 2277:summarised 2055:plagiarism 1993:Talk to me 1924:deprecated 1537:describing 1328:This box: 1324:05/22/2010 1162:Stevertigo 1112:Sfan00 IMG 1102:criterion 954:Flat Earth 950:discussion 634:HJ's sock 532:dave souza 469:dave souza 246:Please see 132:CosmicJake 90:Archive 10 4485:Dear Ed, 4288:rationale 4211:this list 3658:Thank you 3601:Yakushima 2995:this edit 2977:the other 2933:WOSlinker 2897:the other 2853:D c weber 2782:Our next 2100:precisely 2008:ice cores 1984:D O N D E 1818:Viriditas 1533:indicated 1501:, or any 1487:sanctions 1235:Nukespeak 1220:Nukespeak 1160:Hey Ed. - 1064:copyright 989:Viriditas 821:Nil Einne 794:Nil Einne 746:Nil Einne 711:Nil Einne 244:(Using {{ 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4547:Uncle Ed 4509:Uncle Ed 4467:Uncle Ed 4374:Uncle Ed 4338:Uncle Ed 4207:CC-BY-SA 4163:Uncle Ed 4039:Uncle Ed 4019:contribs 3952:articles 3863:Uncle Ed 3859:survived 3794:Kitfoxxe 3770:Uncle Ed 3755:CapnPrep 3732:Uncle Ed 3642:Uncle Ed 3580:WP:UNDUE 3496:Uncle Ed 3441:contact 3339:Talkback 3151:Uncle Ed 3028:Uncle Ed 3020:grounds. 2829:BrownBot 2695:Uncle Ed 2658:Uncle Ed 2580:24 hours 2518:Uncle Ed 2494:Kitfoxxe 2439:Uncle Ed 2428:Contribs 2326:Uncle Ed 2311:and the 2254:Uncle Ed 2199:Uncle Ed 2162:Uncle Ed 2082:Uncle Ed 1988:groovily 1883:Uncle Ed 1804:Uncle Ed 1762:Uncle Ed 1726:. Also, 1598:Horrors! 1586:Uncle Ed 1547:Uncle Ed 1454:Uncle Ed 1407:BrownBot 1285:Contribs 1142:Uncle Ed 1092:non-free 1029:Uncle Ed 985:archives 930:Uncle Ed 911:Kitfoxxe 869:Uncle Ed 767:Uncle Ed 693:Uncle Ed 645:Uncle Ed 614:deletion 554:Uncle Ed 518:Uncle Ed 433:BrownBot 382:Wolfview 371:deletion 308:Uncle Ed 279:De728631 255:Uncle Ed 199:deletion 163:Uncle Ed 121:deletion 4419:Andries 4395:Andries 4359:Andries 4053:Andries 3995:deleted 3892:CWenger 3578:. And 3541:deleted 3325:Nuttish 3276:Kumioko 3113:WP:CITE 3107:. Even 2805:WikiPop 2732:deleted 2575:blocked 2419:Hamster 2155:assumed 2071:policy. 2064:WP:NPOV 2002:Request 1964:deleted 1781:Aronoel 1732:Aronoel 1651:deleted 1239:deleted 508:) that 455:to the 39:archive 4326:jones 4124:either 4015:(talk) 3597:little 3557:Yaksar 3447:userfy 3438:speedy 3298:here. 3175:Lionel 3103:about 2979:(talk) 2974:, and 2899:(talk) 2894:, and 2750:Sadads 2627:WP:ANI 2509:WP:COI 2244:- was 2217:really 1930:Bsherr 1468:Notice 1322:Last: 1315:Next: 1156:Hey Ed 960:, and 926:WP:COI 3846:Stalk 3842:Hrafn 3470:don't 3194:Arzel 2674:WP:AE 2623:WP:AN 2615:In a 2540:. -- 2484:into 2476:Merge 2414:Super 2352:Adler 2292:Adler 2225:Adler 2114:Adler 210:Soman 155:other 16:< 4551:talk 4543:bugs 4528:talk 4513:talk 4498:talk 4490:This 4471:talk 4465:? -- 4446:talk 4423:talk 4399:talk 4378:talk 4363:talk 4342:talk 4236:here 4217:; or 4167:talk 4105:for. 4075:this 4057:talk 4043:talk 4037:. -- 3867:talk 3798:talk 3774:talk 3759:talk 3736:talk 3691:talk 3646:talk 3605:talk 3574:See 3500:talk 3486:talk 3482:andy 3455:talk 3451:andy 3329:talk 3300:rpeh 3295:this 3280:talk 3198:talk 3179:talk 3155:talk 3120:rpeh 3097:this 3074:xeno 3049:xeno 3032:talk 3014:war. 3001:xeno 2993:Hm, 2937:talk 2857:talk 2833:talk 2754:talk 2699:talk 2662:talk 2647:here 2586:2020 2582:for 2548:talk 2543:Cirt 2522:talk 2498:talk 2467:talk 2459:here 2443:talk 2425:Talk 2378:talk 2349:Hans 2330:talk 2313:link 2289:Hans 2258:talk 2222:Hans 2203:talk 2185:talk 2166:talk 2136:talk 2111:Hans 2086:talk 2035:talk 1934:talk 1918:here 1887:talk 1822:talk 1808:talk 1785:talk 1766:talk 1736:talk 1722:and 1590:talk 1551:talk 1519:Talk 1477:The 1458:talk 1452:. -- 1439:talk 1427:this 1411:talk 1373:and 1343:edit 1336:talk 1330:view 1261:talk 1209:talk 1146:talk 1127:here 1116:talk 1098:per 1090:and 1033:talk 1011:talk 993:talk 970:talk 964:. -- 934:talk 915:talk 891:talk 873:talk 854:talk 825:talk 798:talk 771:talk 750:talk 738:cast 715:talk 697:talk 649:talk 582:talk 558:talk 536:talk 522:talk 516:. -- 473:talk 437:talk 386:talk 336:talk 312:talk 283:talk 259:talk 237:talk 214:talk 167:talk 136:talk 4538:nit 4322:Ron 4267:. 3947:). 3784:AfD 3685:! - 3417:. 2949:of 2912:of 2869:of 2847:At 2676:. 2625:or 2463:TFD 2461:. 2390:of 2250:did 2246:not 2177:not 2078:one 1572:one 1535:or 1385:). 1170:log 841:FYI 763:sic 349:AfD 248:}}) 177:AfD 99:AfD 4553:) 4530:) 4522:-- 4515:) 4500:) 4473:) 4448:) 4425:) 4405::: 4401:) 4380:) 4365:) 4344:) 4302:. 4276:{{ 4246:}} 4240:{{ 4213:) 4169:) 4146:me 4059:) 4045:) 4017:•( 3997:. 3910:) 3902:• 3869:) 3800:) 3776:) 3761:) 3751:et 3738:) 3693:) 3648:) 3607:) 3543:. 3502:) 3488:) 3457:) 3331:) 3282:) 3200:) 3188:Hi 3181:) 3157:) 3149:-- 3115:. 3034:) 3026:-- 2939:) 2859:) 2835:) 2817:. 2756:) 2738:. 2701:) 2664:) 2550:) 2524:) 2500:) 2492:. 2469:) 2445:) 2380:) 2372:-- 2332:) 2281:If 2260:) 2205:) 2187:) 2168:) 2138:) 2088:) 2037:) 1970:. 1936:) 1926:}} 1922:{{ 1889:) 1824:) 1810:) 1787:) 1779:-- 1768:) 1738:) 1718:, 1714:, 1710:, 1683:☯ 1657:. 1619:TS 1592:) 1576:TS 1553:) 1545:-- 1512:NW 1460:) 1441:) 1413:) 1395:. 1263:) 1245:. 1211:) 1176:) 1172:| 1168:| 1148:) 1118:) 1104:F7 1094:, 1084:F4 1082:, 1074:. 1035:) 1013:) 995:) 972:) 956:, 936:) 917:) 893:) 875:) 856:) 827:) 800:) 773:) 752:) 717:) 699:) 665:. 651:) 631:| 584:) 560:) 552:-- 534:, 524:) 471:, 439:) 415:. 388:) 338:) 314:) 285:) 261:) 239:) 231:. 216:) 169:) 138:) 86:→ 4549:( 4526:( 4511:( 4496:( 4469:( 4444:( 4421:( 4397:( 4376:( 4361:( 4340:( 4324:h 4165:( 4055:( 4041:( 4021:) 3927:⚠ 3906:@ 3898:^ 3894:( 3865:( 3796:( 3772:( 3757:( 3734:( 3728:T 3689:( 3644:( 3603:( 3498:( 3484:( 3453:( 3389:. 3354:. 3327:( 3315:• 3313:E 3311:• 3309:C 3307:• 3305:T 3303:• 3278:( 3245:3 3242:8 3239:F 3236:J 3233:T 3230:C 3196:( 3177:( 3153:( 3135:• 3133:E 3131:• 3129:C 3127:• 3125:T 3123:• 3045:– 3030:( 2935:( 2855:( 2831:( 2824:. 2752:( 2697:( 2660:( 2592:. 2546:( 2520:( 2511:. 2496:( 2465:( 2441:( 2411:~ 2376:( 2328:( 2256:( 2201:( 2183:( 2164:( 2134:( 2084:( 2033:( 1932:( 1885:( 1820:( 1806:( 1783:( 1764:( 1734:( 1681:M 1679:☺ 1677:C 1675:☮ 1673:T 1671:❤ 1588:( 1549:( 1522:) 1516:( 1456:( 1437:( 1409:( 1402:. 1339:• 1333:• 1282:/ 1259:( 1207:( 1174:c 1166:t 1164:( 1144:( 1114:( 1031:( 1009:( 991:( 968:( 932:( 913:( 889:( 871:( 852:( 823:( 796:( 769:( 748:( 713:( 695:( 647:( 580:( 556:( 520:( 435:( 384:( 334:( 310:( 281:( 257:( 235:( 212:( 165:( 134:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index