312:
investment in a situation) for another (our belief that we can foresee all factors that will ever be relevant to a situation ahead of time.) We must in fact be ready to ever ask ourselves "Had I foreseen the current situation when I was drawing up my standards, would I have drawn up the standard that I did?" We must give our best effort to adapt our standards in the fairest manner we can, in response to possibilities we simply did not foresee. It is a difficult balancing act, and it is not made easier by the fact that those who hate the other side will be eager to claim that we have failed (for if we had been looking at the situation
355:"Ad hominem" is only committed when you are stating criticism of a argument's proponent in order to suggest that the argument itself is thereby weakened. If you aren't doing that, you aren't committing ad hominem. Saying "X must be crazy to insist that Y is true" is not ad hominem; it is "Y is untrue; after all, X who is crazy insists that Y
176:... if people would wait four minutes to write one decent paragraph before creating an article, they wouldn't be so apt to get listed on VfD. Posting something like the first version of this article is like walking out the front door naked, and then complaining that people didn't even give you a chance to get dressed.
307:
to minimize the effects of their own biases. That is to establish and live by standards that apply in all situations, whether its application in a particular situation happens to favor us or not. Just as canny mothers let one child decide how the treat shall be cut into two pieces and let the other
368:
It doesn't mean "creating an artificially balanced situation, such that if the reader comes away convinced of one side or the other, the article must be failing at being NPOV." Instead, it means honestly conveying not only what each side believes, but why a reasonable person might believe it to be
229:
I now know I was wrong. If you have the basic desire to act ethically in the first place, then you have to take second place in line to a whole lot of other people out there who can do a lot better of a job twisting your good intentions into bad deeds than you can. To be hoist by one's own petard
351:
On the subject of the latter, no fallacy is so relentlessly mis-recognized as "ad hominem" argumentation. Ironically, it is well-known to poor debaters as exactly what it warns against: a club with which to bludgeon your opponent rather than to refute his/her argumentation. Simply wait for your
136:
Therefore, GOOPTI is what I will be using from now on, to denote
Granularity Out Of Proportion To Influence. This is based on the principle that there is a place on Knowledge for descriptions for television shows and video games and webcomics, but how much detail these things actually deserve is
347:
The modern educational system doesn't, in my opinion, give nearly the importance that it should to the subject of critical thinking -- particularly of learning to recognize logical fallacies and other invalid forms of argumentation. Many people know nothing at all about the subject -- and many
311:
Does this mean that the task of acting ethically is as simple as determining rules in advance and then adhering to them, come hell or high water? If only it were that simple! But that would be simply trading one form of arrogance (our belief that we will never be swayed by our own emotional
359:
true" that is ad hominem. Which means that the sophist's favorite trick of trying to provoke frustration from an opponent, and then leaping on the first sign of frustration as "You're resorting to ad hominem! Your argument is clearly weak!" is ... itself ad hominem.
270:
compensation for one's own POV is impossible, that they have no obligation to even try. Such all-or-nothing thinking is hardly plausible, but it seems to sucker in some people anyhow. Some even make the self-interested mistake of claiming moral superiority based on
102:
167:, and others I probably haven't thought of yet. On the other hand, if not much more can be said about a series than that the people who like it really like it a lot ... then perhaps it is not yet at the level where multiple articles are appropriate.
128:". Because so many people had it in their heads that "fancruft" was automatically a pejorative term, and even started editing pages that described fancruft and other such terms to declare that it was a pejorative term (which is equivalent to
257:
The worst way to approach this dilemma is to refuse to do anything at all about it; to simply refuse to do anything to compensate for your own POV. This is obvious. What should be equally obvious, but eludes many people, is that it is not
132:
of anyone using the term) it became clear that those of us who used the term simply as a quick way of saying "too much detail for something that has not yet become notable enough to deserve this level of granularity" had lost the battle.
329:
People who take it upon themselves to pass judgement that others have "fail as human beings." When you believe yourself entitled to pass a judgement of that magnitude, rest assured that you have reached the point where your time is
299:
eyes are open!" How many of them actually believe this? How many have allowed themselves to believe it because it gives them a smug sense of being morally superior for ignoring their responsibilities? Who knows.
217:
Very often the difference between "facts" and "knowledge" is context. One article, eight paragraphs long, may create more actual understanding than the same material divided in eight one-paragraph articles.
245:
One of the central dilemmas of life for those who want to act ethically is the knowledge that we can never reach that perfection: we will never see a situation with complete clarity; we will never think of
638:
189:. The six criteria there close up many of the loopholes by which troublemaking morons can, with minimal effort, create valueless articles that under the current rules, take us a week to eliminate.
137:
proportional to how much influence they have actually had on the real world. Examples of fictional properties that have had influence significant enough that they might deserve multiple articles:
191:
Note: it appears this proposal didn't pass, which is disappointing. It also appears that the voting was already closed at the time that the proposal's existence was made known to most of us...
107:
I have been accused of being a "cult PR agent" by anti-cult activists and an anti-cult fanatic by cult supporters. I must be doing something right. Strange; one might conclude that I must
308:
child decide who gets which piece, deciding on your rules before you know which side of them you'll be on encourages you to make rules that are fair as you can manage for all parties.
914:
1071:
906:
922:
591:
226:
I used to believe (and tell others that I believed) that "When your goal is to act in an ethical and moral manner, your first and foremost enemy is always yourself."
1176:
1048:
1031:
483:
Lincoln, Abraham; Grant, U. S.; & Davis, Jefferson (1861). ''Resolving Family
Differences Peacefully'' (3rd ed.). Gettysburg: Printing Press. ISBN 0-12-345678-9.
820:
517:
Note: though I'm not sure why anyone would complain, I would just like to give credit to head off complaints; I copied this 'Boilerplate text' section from
1189:
1172:
1044:
1027:
836:
1206:
233:
Beware of approaching a problem by trying to find its identifying characteristics. What is truly needed, and what should be the goal of your search, is
621:
101:
205:
Double-check your own work, if you can. If you're going to be calling someone else wrong, it's a good idea to triple-check to make sure that you
1223:
1010:
181:
894:] to promote" a particular subject, because that editor is particularly proud of their work on the article, is false and irresponsible.)
427:
54:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than
888:
promoting their subjects, only for describing them, to claim that an editor is "particularly proud of his use of the dictionary [
209:
in fact right. If you have the bad judgement to be snotty about calling someone else wrong, have the good judgement to quadruple-check.
352:
opponent to say something that can be interpreted as un-nice and then pounce, screeching "ad hominem! ad hominem! you must be wrong!"
999:
672:
The following are articles where I am either especially proud of my contributions, or I was the creator of the article, or both (
472:
40:
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than
629:
1166:
994:
984:
937:
932:
911:
842:
625:
378:
266:
refuse to do anything to compensate for your own POV. Some people actually do take this route; they believe that because
1200:
1183:
1055:
1038:
952:
947:
701:
1217:
84:
1132:
1078:
1068:
978:
942:
202:
Never be hasty to attribute to stupidity what can be adequately explained by someone knowing something you don't.
903:
660:
539:
1149:
919:
878:
574:
1234:
1021:
734:
551:
545:
395:
1096:
716:
582:
989:
848:
129:
51:
578:
525:
186:
1113:
872:
825:
649:
602:
1159:
962:
866:
860:
645:
To create an access panel to the same watchlist page elsewhere, copy and paste the following code:
598:
To create an access panel to the same watchlist page elsewhere, copy and paste the following code:
1193:
1210:
1125:
971:
798:
686:
303:
The fact is that there is something which people who care about the effect of their actions
697:
692:
230:
is not necessarily the easiest or most common way to go, only the one with the most irony.
34:
390:
8:
1155:
854:
728:
722:
478:
Lastname, Firstname (Month Day, Year). "Article Title". ''Periodical Title'', p. PageNum.
1142:
830:
754:
749:
745:
518:
125:
320:
we would see it exactly as they do!) But no one said that acting ethically was easy.
1227:
1014:
556:
197:
145:
254:
whether we are seeing the situation as we would if we were not personally involved.
1121:
1089:
967:
786:
771:
291:, because you have not given up the battle as fruitless, and therefore you must be
93:
I am proud to be the recipient of a WikiMedal for
Janitorial Services, awarded by
776:
706:
534:
94:
1138:
1106:
885:
760:
178:
139:
240:
680:
463:
1085:
792:
766:
250:
the possible angles on a situation. Most disturbingly, we will never be
814:
781:
740:
528:
seems like a better resource, however. Closer to the source, and all.
458:
340:
157:
163:
151:
1102:
809:
804:
652:|Knowledge:WikiProject Scientology/publicwatchlist}}
348:
others only know enough to (wittingly or unwittingly) misapply it.
85:
Click here if you want to read my thoughts on a new wiki design.
275:
trying to do anything about their biases. "Aha!" they crow. "
65:
283:, which is that attempting to do anything about your POV is
711:
338:
323:
890:
241:
Let your reach exceed your grasp, or what's a heaven for?
111:
working on cult articles, but such is not the case...
415:{{imdb name|id=0000000|title=Name as it will appear}}
659:
221:
622:Knowledge:WikiProject Scientology/publicwatchlist
605:|Knowledge:Redirects to be made}}
124:GOOPTI is the term I use for what others call "
400:
334:best spent on the mote in your brother's eye.
410:{{imdb title|id=0000000|title=The Title}}
363:
324:People who amuse me with their pettiness
212:
262:to acknowledge that you have a POV and
676:indicates an article that I created):
473:Knowledge:Citing sources/example style
287:! Therefore I am morally superior to
995:Special:Contributions/VIVALDI ROCKS!
985:Special:Contributions/168.215.232.22
938:Special:Contributions/210.49.148.148
933:Special:Contributions/216.153.214.94
843:The Chimes of Big Ben (The Prisoner)
667:
170:
90:Hello, my name is Antaeus Feldspar.
18:
953:Special:Contributions/208.54.95.129
948:Special:Contributions/206.55.81.240
884:(Note: Because Knowledge articles
702:Boyer-Moore string search algorithm
491:Listed for deletion: {{subst:afd}}
63:. The original page is located at
13:
14:
1247:
943:Special:Contributions/195.93.33.7
506:Inclusion dispute: {{inclusion}}
544:
512:Editing in progress: {{inuse}}
369:true (without necessarily being
100:
661:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing
540:Knowledge:Template messages/All
420:{{gutenberg|no=000|name=Title}}
222:Protect yourself from falsehood
114:
920:Knowledge:Redirects to be made
879:Knowledge:Redirects to be made
575:Knowledge:Redirects to be made
503:Factual errors: {{Disputed}}
1:
735:Doctrine of substantial truth
60:pedia
46:pedia
31:pedia
717:City of Angels (1976 series)
385:
7:
990:Special:Contributions/SAINT
849:The Testament of Dr. Mabuse
196:Feldspar's Blade Guard for
185:I support the proposal for
10:
1252:
897:
526:Knowledge:Boilerplate text
434:Biographical: {{bio-stub}}
401:Frequently used formatting
873:Knowledge:Content forking
826:Template:Public watchlist
509:Protected: {{protected}}
119:
963:Special:Contributions/AI
867:Under color of authority
861:Toys in the Attic (film)
444:Computer: {{compu-stub}}
73:ki/User:Antaeus_Feldspar
497:Spoilers: {{spoiler}}
449:Television: {{tv-stub}}
439:Comics: {{comics-stub}}
57:Wiki
43:Wiki
28:Wiki
639:Check shared watchlist
592:Check shared watchlist
295:of the truth to which
1000:/AI/Miscategorization
799:Mongo the Magnificent
687:Anthony Godby Johnson
364:What NPOV means to me
213:Why I support merging
698:Blood Sucking Freaks
693:Augmented assignment
620:Shared watchlist at
573:Shared watchlist at
531:Other useful links:
1156:California guy
855:Thunderbirds Are GO
821:Template:Movedetail
729:Denial (psychology)
723:David Bauer (actor)
555:notion stolen from
455:Special formatting
1190:Andrew eagles
837:The Body of Christ
831:The Cold Equations
755:Elias omega coding
750:Elias gamma coding
746:Elias delta coding
130:assuming bad faith
105:
88:
50:you are viewing a
668:Sample of my work
657:
656:
610:
609:
373:in that belief.)
237:characteristics.
171:Walking Out Naked
146:The Twilight Zone
99:
82:
81:
80:
1243:
787:Lauren Stratford
772:Fibonacci coding
653:
650:public watchlist
633:
617:
612:
611:
606:
603:public watchlist
586:
570:
565:
564:
494:Stub: {{stub}}
484:
479:
187:Managed Deletion
104:
77:
74:
71:
68:
62:
61:
58:
49:
47:
44:
33:
32:
29:
19:
16:Knowledge editor
1251:
1250:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1082:
1077:
1064:
958:
928:
912:/Cults and NRMs
900:
777:Fighting Whites
707:Candida Royalle
670:
665:
664:
647:
646:
619:
618:
615:
600:
599:
572:
571:
568:
562:
549:
500:NPOV: {{NPOV}}
482:
477:
406:External links
403:
391:Interiot's tool
388:
379:/Intro sections
366:
345:
326:
243:
224:
215:
173:
122:
117:
72:
69:
67:https://en.wiki
66:
64:
59:
56:
55:
45:
42:
41:
39:
30:
27:
26:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1249:
1239:
1238:
1221:
1204:
1187:
1170:
1153:
1136:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1075:
1074:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1042:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
992:
987:
982:
956:
955:
950:
945:
940:
935:
926:
925:
917:
909:
899:
896:
669:
666:
663:
658:
655:
654:
642:
641:
635:
634:
608:
607:
595:
594:
588:
587:
548:
543:
535:Knowledge:ISBN
514:
513:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
480:
469:
468:
467:
466:
461:
453:
452:
451:
446:
441:
436:
426:Stub notices (
424:
423:
422:
417:
412:
402:
399:
387:
384:
383:
382:
377:My beliefs on
365:
362:
344:
343:" is and isn't
337:
336:
335:
325:
322:
242:
239:
235:distinguishing
223:
220:
214:
211:
198:Hanlon's Razor
172:
169:
121:
118:
116:
113:
79:
78:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1248:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1205:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1173:Buddyandwilly
1171:
1168:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1115:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1080:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1045:65.146.30.209
1043:
1040:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1028:208.106.20.67
1026:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1001:
998:
997:
996:
993:
991:
988:
986:
983:
980:
977:
973:
969:
966:
965:
964:
961:
960:
959:
954:
951:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
934:
931:
930:
929:
924:
921:
918:
916:
913:
910:
908:
905:
902:
901:
895:
893:
892:
887:
882:
881:
880:
875:
874:
869:
868:
863:
862:
857:
856:
851:
850:
845:
844:
839:
838:
833:
832:
827:
823:
822:
817:
816:
811:
807:
806:
801:
800:
795:
794:
789:
788:
783:
779:
778:
773:
769:
768:
763:
762:
761:False balance
757:
756:
751:
747:
743:
742:
737:
736:
731:
730:
725:
724:
719:
718:
713:
709:
708:
703:
699:
695:
694:
689:
688:
683:
682:
677:
675:
662:
651:
644:
643:
640:
637:
636:
631:
627:
623:
614:
613:
604:
597:
596:
593:
590:
589:
584:
580:
576:
567:
566:
563:
560:
559:
558:
553:
552:My Scratchpad
547:
546:My Scratchpad
542:
541:
537:
536:
532:
529:
527:
523:
522:
520:
519:Exploding Boy
511:
508:
505:
502:
499:
496:
493:
490:
489:
481:
476:
475:
474:
471:
470:
465:
462:
460:
457:
456:
454:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
431:
429:
425:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
408:
407:
405:
404:
398:
397:
393:
392:
380:
376:
375:
374:
372:
361:
358:
353:
349:
342:
333:
328:
327:
321:
319:
315:
309:
306:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
265:
261:
255:
253:
249:
238:
236:
231:
227:
219:
210:
208:
203:
201:
199:
193:
192:
188:
183:
182:
180:
177:
168:
166:
165:
160:
159:
154:
153:
148:
147:
142:
141:
140:Sesame Street
134:
131:
127:
112:
110:
103:
98:
96:
91:
87:
86:
75:
53:
38:
36:
23:
21:
20:
1231:
1214:
1197:
1180:
1163:
1146:
1129:
1110:
1093:
1079:/In Progress
1076:
1069:/CoolClarity
1063:
1052:
1035:
1018:
975:
957:
927:
889:
883:
877:
871:
865:
859:
853:
847:
841:
835:
829:
819:
813:
803:
797:
791:
785:
775:
765:
759:
753:
739:
733:
727:
721:
715:
705:
691:
685:
681:A. B. and C.
679:
678:
673:
671:
648:{{
616:Access Panel
601:{{
569:Access Panel
561:
557:David Gerard
554:
550:
538:
533:
530:
524:
516:
515:
464:Help:Formula
448:
443:
438:
433:
419:
414:
409:
394:
389:
370:
367:
356:
354:
350:
346:
331:
317:
316:, they say,
313:
310:
304:
302:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
267:
263:
259:
256:
251:
247:
244:
234:
232:
228:
225:
216:
206:
204:
195:
194:
190:
184:
175:
174:
162:
156:
150:
144:
138:
135:
123:
115:Philosophies
108:
106:
92:
89:
83:
70:pedia.org/wi
24:
1122:Streamlight
968:Nikitchenko
886:are not for
793:Mary Morris
767:Femme Films
52:mirror site
1207:Marc-André
904:/Computers
815:Solar Pons
782:Hash table
741:Dr. Mabuse
459:Help:Table
341:ad hominem
285:impossible
260:any better
158:Doctor Who
25:This is a
428:Full list
386:Resources
279:know the
164:Star Wars
152:Star Trek
95:Topbanana
35:user page
1235:contribs
1218:contribs
1201:contribs
1184:contribs
1167:contribs
1150:contribs
1139:Handiman
1133:contribs
1114:contribs
1097:contribs
1056:contribs
1039:contribs
1022:contribs
979:contribs
810:Rejected
805:Narbonic
396:/Sources
293:ignorant
179:Dpbsmith
126:fancruft
1226: (
1224:Spanked
1209: (
1192: (
1175: (
1158: (
1141: (
1124: (
1105: (
1088: (
1047: (
1030: (
1013: (
1011:Terryeo
970: (
898:Special
630:History
583:History
371:correct
268:perfect
1230:
1213:
1196:
1179:
1162:
1145:
1128:
1109:
1092:
1086:JimmyT
1051:
1034:
1017:
974:
339:What "
318:surely
314:fairly
305:can do
120:GOOPTI
1072:Check
923:Check
915:Check
907:Check
281:truth
109:enjoy
1228:talk
1211:talk
1194:talk
1177:talk
1160:talk
1143:talk
1126:talk
1107:talk
1090:talk
1049:talk
1032:talk
1015:talk
972:talk
712:Cilk
674:bold
626:Edit
579:Edit
264:then
252:sure
1103:UNK
891:sic
332:not
289:you
273:not
248:all
207:are
1099:)
1024:)
876:-
870:-
864:-
858:-
852:-
846:-
840:-
834:-
828:-
824:-
818:-
812:-
808:-
802:-
796:-
790:-
784:-
780:-
774:-
770:-
764:-
758:-
752:-
748:-
744:-
738:-
732:-
726:-
720:-
714:-
710:-
704:-
700:-
696:-
690:-
684:-
628:|
581:|
430:)
357:is
297:my
161:,
155:,
149:,
143:,
97:.
1237:)
1232:·
1220:)
1215:·
1203:)
1198:·
1186:)
1181:·
1169:)
1164:·
1152:)
1147:·
1135:)
1130:·
1116:)
1111:·
1094:·
1058:)
1053:·
1041:)
1036:·
1019:·
981:)
976:·
632:)
624:(
585:)
577:(
521:.
381:.
277:I
200::
76:.
48:,
37:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
